• 回答数

    3

  • 浏览数

    160

达达1110
首页 > 英语培训 > 慢速英语听力200

3个回答 默认排序
  • 默认排序
  • 按时间排序

晓晓小同学

已采纳

第一步:精听VOA慢速英语听力资料(最好不要看原文) 刚开始的时候绝对不要看原文,尤其对那些本来就很清晰的听力资料。这主要是希望大家不要依赖原文,自己一定要一个单词一个单词的完全听懂 有的同学说我有那么几个单词实在听不懂怎么办? 大家想一想,慢速英语的单词量是1500到2000,也就是说一个比较好的高中生的单词量已经超过了许多,更何况四级都已通过的你。听不懂的唯一原因绝对不是生词的问题,只能是你对这个单词的发音极其陌生,大脑根本没有反映。如果让你看一看原文,你会不屑一顾的,但在听的时候却不知所云。本网站的论坛上提供了VOA基本词汇,并提供了音标和例句。起初我练习的时候有时为了一个单词可以想上整整一天,嘴里老是念道着这个单词的发音。当然如果有些同学说这段录音我已经听了十遍了,当中的几个单词你就是打死我我也听不出来。如果真的到了这个地步,你可以看看原文。 接下来要做的就是要保证这一段录音你是完完全全的听懂了。什么是完完全全的听懂了呢?就是每听完一句话,你都能准确的复述出来,包括每一个单词。这里在语音上不是很好的朋友要注意了,由于是慢速英语,所以只要你有正常的听力能力再加上一定的毅力,就完全可以把自己的发音模仿的和VOA的播音员没什么两样,正如李阳老师所指出的:发音是一个人的英语门面。的确是这样的!如果你按照这样的方法用心练习,不出一两个月,你的发音就会有长足的进步。其实我们大多数中国人的模仿发音天赋都是很好的,随便叫出一名大学四级通过的大学生,他(她)的发音就要比我所见到的意大利人,日本人,菲律宾人的发音不知要好多少倍。 其实我们中国学生在口语和听力上缺陷主要有两个原因: 一是缺乏练习。这也是传统教学方法的遗憾。包括我自己,也是这种只注重书面的“分析英语”的受害者。二是缺乏勇气。老是害怕自己会说错,害怕丢脸。除非你是在国外长大,英语就是母语,你可以“自豪”的说:我就是说错了那也是对的,因为英语是我的母语。而我们把英语作为第二语言的学习是不可能不犯错误的,多犯错误是为了少犯错误。 还是说听力吧。这样一句一句直到把每一句话完全“吃掉“,已经基本上可以保证你已听懂了这段文章。要达到什么样的标准呢?我对自己的要求是在落后一两个单词的同步复述。如果说上面这一点是练习了语音的话,下面的两个重要工作才是我们利用听力材料练习口语和口译的重要。 第二步:同步复述 现在大家已经把这段录音的意思完全搞懂了,而且能够惟妙惟肖的基本同步复述了。请大家注意,直到现在你的大脑还没有动起来,也就是说这些完全是些机械的模仿,刻板的复述。这种机械的重复对于我们的口语和开口能力是不会有“事半功倍“的效果的。 要想提高自己的口语水平,在这里就一定要学会用自己的话,请注意是用自己的话,而不是照本宣章,把所听到录音的大意死活说出来。做这一步是在听完整段录音之后。此时所说的英语才是你真正的英语口语水平。在练习中尽量使用刚刚听到的一些关键动词和词组。在说的时候,想象自己正在对一个没有听过录音的同学讲述故事的情节。我相信很多同学在刚刚开始练习的时候会“憋的”说不出几句象样的话,或是在大意和情节上丢三落四的。出现这种情况太正常了。这样就反映了我们刚刚所做的同步复述只是一个辨音过程。现在所做的自我总结才真正开动了我们的大脑,提高了真正的口语水平。 第三步:练习口译能力 好了,到了这一步你已经很不错了,不仅能够把这段录音完全听懂,同步复述,而且还可以用自己的英语对你的朋友娓娓道来。是不是感觉很有成就感啊!但是我还得继续更深层次的练习。对了,就是口译能力,我们中国学生特有的中英文自由转换能力。还是刚刚那段录音,这回是放一句英语,你就立刻把这句话翻译成地道的中文,翻译成我们平时所讲的中国话。 你可别小看这一步,自己试着去翻翻看,就会马上懂得:我们能够同步的用英语复述了并不代表我们就可以同步的翻译成地道的中文。我对自己的要求也是在落后一句的速度下进行同步翻译,由于是慢速英语,所以只要耐心的多练习几遍就一定能够达到同步听译的水平。 至此,我们不仅已经对这段录音了如指掌,而且还利用它进行了有针对性的口语和口译训练。很多同学老是抱怨没有语言环境,我觉得语言环境多数情况下还得靠自己创造。请大家再次注意,上面我所介绍的听力方法都是针对慢速英语的,大家不要操之过急,一步一个脚印,把十盘慢速英语的磁带按照这样三步认真的做下来,你的听力就已经打好了坚实的基础。希望能帮到你。

慢速英语听力200

209 评论(11)

好吃不懒做也

这当然可以呀

126 评论(13)

嘟嘟200907

Modern technology has a strong influence on many things we do. In fact, technology is shaping almost every part of our day-to-day existence, including education. Ashok Goel is a professor with the School of Interactive Computing at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta. Goel says he uses the Internet in almost all of the classes he teaches. Every term over 300 graduate students take his class on artificial intelligence (AI). The students never meet in person. All of the classes take place online -- through a website. The site lets students ask questions and complete their work from anywhere in the world. Having hundreds of students in a class means Ashok Goel has to answer thousands of questions. He has eight teaching assistants to help him. But even that is not enough to give all the students the help they need. So, in January, Goel had an idea. First, he noted that each term his students were asking many of the same questions. Then he decided to try an experiment. At the start of the spring 2016 semester, he added a new member to his teaching team: Jill Watson. She was able to answer questions faster than most other teaching assistants. And she was available 24 hours a day. It was only at the end of the semester that Goel’s students learned Watson’s secret: she was not a real person like the other teaching assistants. Jill Watson is an AI computer program. Goel says only two students came close to predicting Watson’s true identity. He was worried about telling his students because he thought they would not like being part of the experiment. But once they learned Watson’s identity, they became very excited. "Then, you know what happened? They not only asked that question about Jill. ‘Is she an AI?’ Once the identity of Jill was revealed they also asked if I was an AI." Goel now uses Watson in two other classes, but still does not tell his students which of his teaching assistants is a computer program. He hopes this technology will make it easier for teachers to create their own programs to use in and outside the classroom. And it appears stories like his will only become more common. A website called Campus Technology publishes stories about how colleges and universities use new technology. In August, the site published a survey of over 500 professors and their use of technology. Fifty-five percent of the professors said they ask students to use study materials online before coming to class. And, more than 70 percent said they combine online materials and face-to-face teaching in their classrooms. Ashok Goel says the new kinds of technology becoming available will increase the availability of learning all over the world. But there are some concerns about how well the technology works. SRI International is a non-profit organization that researches many different issues. In April, the group released the results of a survey of educational technology at 14 colleges. The study measured the effect of online classwork and special programs that measured student progress and made suggestions about educational resources. The study found that the technology did little to help student performance. Louise Yarnall is a senior research social scientist at SRI International. She says there are two major problems. First, she says, the technology has yet to reach a level that proves how useful it can be. Second, there is no system to make sure the technology is used the same way. Yarnall notes that students and teachers all use the special programs in different ways. This means they may not be using the technology as best they can. "Just like in school when teacher says, ‘Do your homework,’ we have found that students who do their homework tend to do pretty well in school and students who don’t do their homework often don’t do so well in school. And the same idea applies here with adaptive learning. If you don’t use it, you don’t progress." Yarnall worries that once more technology enters classrooms, teachers and students will be more concerned about the technology than anything else. Jose Bowen goes even further. Bowen is the president of Goucher College in Baltimore, Maryland. He wrote a book arguing against the use of technology in classrooms. It is called “Teaching Naked.” Bowen admits that technology does improve the availability of information. But he notes technology is not free. It still mostly goes only to people that have money to pay for it. Bowen also warns that giving students more information through the internet or social media does not help them understand how to use that information. He says the job of a college is to teach people how to think critically and find their place in the world around them. Technology can bring teachers to students all over the world, as in the case of Ashok Goel’s class at Georgia Tech. But Bowen notes that online classes do little for students with limited educational experience. "So those tools are there. But the problem is that online content by itself doesn’t know how to ask you the question ‘What interests you? What motivates you?’ … The first thing a good swim teacher does is ask you a couple of questions. The first question is, ‘How do you feel about water?’ And if you don’t like water, then I change my lesson plan. … And if you love water, well maybe I push you in the deep end." He admits there is a place for technology outside the classroom. It can do some things teachers cannot, like provide answers immediately when a teacher is unavailable. Bowen says teachers must accept the many things technology can do that they cannot. But he and Goel agree that nothing can replace the personal relationship between teachers and students. And the training in the classrooms of today may be the only thing that prepares students for the technology of tomorrow.

272 评论(13)

相关问答