祎伊妈妈
挺好的想法,祝你成功。但是现在的英语培训竟争也激烈,一定要有特色。针对这个年令是不错的。我建议你采用外教远程上课的方式教学,也就是实际的学校,但是老师全部外教,并且全部远程上课。外教英语课,随时可以上课,中教的价格,永远不缺少幼儿英语老师!幼儿园办学亮点!一、全外教上课 是有特色的,别说二线城市,在北京上海都能立得住脚二、远程上课,大幅降低了外教的成本,中国老师相当的价格三、大幅降低了风险,外教远程上课,计时收费,不上课不收费四、称定的技术,日本 韩国已普遍采用,国内也有部分学校在上课五、随时可以参观真实课堂搜索 好伙伴英语 详细了解
木有雨啊
Emergency plans 紧急预案 Event Planning 活动策划 Activity Elements 活动要素 Activity background 活动背景
百变珠珠侠may
Cure to change background:The United States is nowadays to there is only one no establishment in world all the people medical treatment guarantee system of flourishing nation;Medical treatment expenditure Increase soon quick at the economy increase soon, also Gao at the income increase soon with inflation rate;30,000,000 Americans don't have the medical treatment insurance. Cure to change important point:All American in 2014 year agos the realization"the everyone have been already cured to protect". Issue focus:"State-run cure to protect" of the House of Representatives version contents is delete;Money raising how pay to cure to change bill up, the Senate and House has a dissimilarity a project. Through several month of hard negotiation with argue, U.S. Congress Senate finally at 24 days at local time vote to pass have be subjected to domestic and international concern of medical treatment reform bill.This marking Ao cure of Ba Ma3 changed lawmaking to once rush key of a pass, later on Senate and House consultation and formation cure to change bill to unify a text origin, hand over is sign by the president to take effect. The idea is in "the everyone have been already cured to protect" The Senate cure to change a bill aim at will 30,000,000 don't enjoy the American of medical treatment insurance to bring in to cure to change category.After take effect of in a 10 years, should the bill anticipate and will cost USD 871,000,000,000, but meeting the government budget deficit decrease USD 132,000,000,000. The clear statement provision of the bill first time, almost all American should own medical treatment insurance in 2014 year agos.For the income in year low at USD 43320 of personal with the house of the three people lower than USD 73240, the federal government will give to cure to protect a subsidy.Bill still provision, the government can pass a series the prize and punishment measure urge sincerely a business enterprise to provide to cure to protect toward the employee and forbid insurance company because of insure oneself existence health problem but brush-off its insuring request or jacking up an insurance fee. The Senate and House has a rift Pass with House of Representatives of cure and change bill text origin compare, Senate text origin with it existence very big difference.Can foresee, before the bill unify text origin deliver Ao Ba, President horse, to sign, the house of parliament still want to experience difficulties of negotiate with compromise.The case unify a text origin deliver Ao Ba, President horse, before sign, the house of parliament still want to experience difficulties of negotiate with compromise. Contrast two text origin, the most outstanding difference lie in having no"state-run cure to protect" contents.House of Representatives text origin include this contents, the purpose let the government insurance organization and privately owned insurance company launch a competition, to insure crowd to provide a cheap insurance product.But Senate text origin have no this contents, provision the government can make selection privately owned organization to contract for management nation insurance plan. Another controversy point concentration at federal subsidy can used for abortion.At some conservative parties democracy party congressman of mightiness under the request, the House of Representatives cure to change bill strict forbid to cure federal to protect subsidy to used for abortion surgical operation.However, the Senate adopt to more loosen on this problem of position. In addition, how the money raising pay to cure to change bill up, two hospitals also put forward a dissimilarity a project.The House of Representatives put forward increasing a tax toward the wealthy stratum with make up funds indentation, the Senate lay claim to towards increasing a tax way to have oneself of, in the meantime more the persistence pass to collect tax toward Gao E2's insurance policy of the way acquire a funds. The success or failure gain and loss is still difficult to anticipate Joining the government to cure angle top to see is the administration point of the Ao Ba Ma3 government and cure to change bill if can smooth set, doubtless is him ruling career an a little bit big and bright, also ability show national legislature democracy a party a person to promote lawmaking of ability.The angle see from the economy and cure to change also ability to the United States economy creation positive effect, contribute to decrease finance in the red.See from the people's livelihood angle, should bill such as ability at assurance medical treatment service level of in the meantime, practical lower to cure to protect expenditure and extension cure to protect to overlay noodles, will also give the United States medical treatment system and social activities bring graveness variety. But expert point out, the medical treatment reform be a the process which gradually launch, can't judge its success or failure in the short run.Currently but speech, face an economy crisis, Gao jobless rate with continuously ascension of finance in the red, there has been not a few people mean hard accept cure of"compensate first behind earn" to change a project. Around cure to change, democracy party and Republican party carried on give tit for tat of conflict, democracy party inner part freedom parties with conservative parties of divide also day by day severity.Be showed from this, calculate medical treatment reform the lawmaking be smooth completion, should the project be "blessing disaster mutually depend on" to the Ao Ba Ma3's government, to the United States political situation, economy and society will creation what influence, in the short run return hard make to answer.对照医改背景:美国是当今世界惟一没有建立全民医疗保障制度的发达国家;医疗开支 增速快于经济增速,也高于收入增速和通货膨胀率;3000万美国人没有医疗保险。 医改要点:在2014年前所有美国人实现"人人有医保"。 争论焦点:众议院版"国营医保"内容被删除;在如何筹资支付医改法案上,参众两院有不同方案。 经过几个月的艰苦谈判和辩论,美国国会参议院终于在当地时间24日投票通过了备受国内外关注的医疗改革法案。这标志着奥巴马的医改立法闯过了关键的一关,随后参众两院将协商并形成医改法案统一文本,交由总统签署生效。 意在“人人有医保” 参议院的医改法案旨在将3000万不享受医疗保险的美国人纳入医改范畴。在生效后的第一个10年内,该法案预计将耗资8710亿美元,但会将政府预算赤字减少1320亿美元。 法案首次明文规定,几乎所有美国人都应在2014年前拥有医疗保险。对于年收入低于43320美元的个人和低于73240美元的三口之家,联邦政府将给予医保补贴。法案还规定,政府可以通过一系列奖惩措施敦促企业向雇员提供医保,禁止保险公司因投保者本身存在健康问题而拒绝其投保要求或抬高保费。 参众两院有分歧 与众议院通过的医改法案文本相比,参议院文本与之存在很大差异。可以预见,在法案统一文本送交奥巴马总统签署前,国会两院还要经历艰难的磋商和妥协。案统一文本送交奥巴马总统签署前,国会两院还要经历艰难的磋商和妥协。 对比两份文本,最突出的差异在于有无“国营医保”内容。众议院文本包括这一内容,目的是让政府保险机构与私营保险公司展开竞争,向投保人群提供廉价保险产品。但参议院文本没有这一内容,只规定政府可选定私营机构承包经营国家保险计划。 另一个争议点集中在联邦补贴能否用于堕胎。在一些保守派民主党众议员的强烈要求下,众议院医改法案严格禁止将联邦医保补贴用于堕胎手术。然而,参议院在这一问题上采取较为宽松的立场。 此外,在如何筹资支付医改法案上,两院也提出不同方案。众议院提出向富裕阶层增税以弥补资金缺口,参议院对增税办法有自己的主张,同时更坚持通过向高额保单征税的方式获得资金。 成败得失尚难料 从政治角度上看,作为奥巴马政府的施政重点,医改法案如果能够顺利出台,无疑是他执政生涯一大亮点,也能彰显国会民主党人推行立法的能力。从经济角度看,医改也能对美国经济产生积极作用,有助于减少财政赤字。从民生角度看,该法案如能在保证医疗服务水平的同时,切实降低医保开支和扩大医保覆盖面,也会给美国医疗体制和社会生活带来重大变化。 但专家指出,医疗改革是一个逐步展开的过程,短期内无法判定其成败。就目前而言,面对经济危机、高失业率和不断上升的财政赤字,已有不少民众表示难以接受“先赔后赚”的医改方案。 围绕医改,民主党和共和党进行了针锋相对的斗争,民主党内部自由派和保守派的分化也日益严重。由此可见,就算医疗改革立法顺利完成,该方案对奥巴马政府是“福祸相依”,对美国政局、经济和社会将产生何种影响,短期内还难以作答。
爱家薇薇
回答 共 1 条医改背景:美国是当今世界惟一没有建立全民医疗保障制度的发达国家;医疗开支 增速快于经济增速,也高于收入增速和通货膨胀率;3000万美国人没有医疗保险。 医改要点:在2014年前所有美国人实现"人人有医保"。 争论焦点:众议院版"国营医保"内容被删除;在如何筹资支付医改法案上,参众两院有不同方案。 经过几个月的艰苦谈判和辩论,美国国会参议院终于在当地时间24日投票通过了备受国内外关注的医疗改革法案。这标志着奥巴马的医改立法闯过了关键的一关,随后参众两院将协商并形成医改法案统一文本,交由总统签署生效。 意在“人人有医保” 参议院的医改法案旨在将3000万不享受医疗保险的美国人纳入医改范畴。在生效后的第一个10年内,该法案预计将耗资8710亿美元,但会将政府预算赤字减少1320亿美元。 法案首次明文规定,几乎所有美国人都应在2014年前拥有医疗保险。对于年收入低于43320美元的个人和低于73240美元的三口之家,联邦政府将给予医保补贴。法案还规定,政府可以通过一系列奖惩措施敦促企业向雇员提供医保,禁止保险公司因投保者本身存在健康问题而拒绝其投保要求或抬高保费。 参众两院有分歧 与众议院通过的医改法案文本相比,参议院文本与之存在很大差异。可以预见,在法案统一文本送交奥巴马总统签署前,国会两院还要经历艰难的磋商和妥协。案统一文本送交奥巴马总统签署前,国会两院还要经历艰难的磋商和妥协。 对比两份文本,最突出的差异在于有无“国营医保”内容。众议院文本包括这一内容,目的是让政府保险机构与私营保险公司展开竞争,向投保人群提供廉价保险产品。但参议院文本没有这一内容,只规定政府可选定私营机构承包经营国家保险计划。 另一个争议点集中在联邦补贴能否用于堕胎。在一些保守派民主党众议员的强烈要求下,众议院医改法案严格禁止将联邦医保补贴用于堕胎手术。然而,参议院在这一问题上采取较为宽松的立场。 此外,在如何筹资支付医改法案上,两院也提出不同方案。众议院提出向富裕阶层增税以弥补资金缺口,参议院对增税办法有自己的主张,同时更坚持通过向高额保单征税的方式获得资金。 成败得失尚难料 从政治角度上看,作为奥巴马政府的施政重点,医改法案如果能够顺利出台,无疑是他执政生涯一大亮点,也能彰显国会民主党人推行立法的能力。从经济角度看,医改也能对美国经济产生积极作用,有助于减少财政赤字。从民生角度看,该法案如能在保证医疗服务水平的同时,切实降低医保开支和扩大医保覆盖面,也会给美国医疗体制和社会生活带来重大变化。 但专家指出,医疗改革是一个逐步展开的过程,短期内无法判定其成败。就目前而言,面对经济危机、高失业率和不断上升的财政赤字,已有不少民众表示难以接受“先赔后赚”的医改方案。