小M回归中
多死了 5555555555555551.With the rise in the level of awareness, we will find that the death penalty for serious crimes can not be an effective deterrent, even with the eradication of the death penalty to reduce crime, just a superstitious people. 2. From a theoretical point of view, the death penalty can not be an effective crime deterrent. "Troubled times heavy penalties" to deter crime deterrent misdemeanours thinking, as early as the Spring and Autumn period in China has been Legalists school of law thinkers as a crime prevention, govern the country classic. Modern Germany in accordance with the Criminal Law of Jurists Feuerbach's "compulsory psychological said," everyone has to avoid becoming music from instinct, as long as criminal penalties might bring enough people suffering, he would not choose crime. The death penalty to bring the perpetrators of pain is the biggest, of course, the perpetrators have the greatest psychological coercion, the perpetrator is the most effective deterrent. First of all, from the root of the crime. Crime is political in a certain society, the economy, culture, education, moral values, family relationships, etc. social factors interact with the perpetrators of the individual product. It is impossible to eradicate the death penalty have complex causes of crime, of course, but also can not fundamentally curb crime have. China late Qing Dynasty great jurist and legal reformer Shen this once pointed out: "Gou not of the heart, and full-time penalty, the side of justice, moving permanently criminal gang, and closes and the world, Yan Zai available?" On " the people Road, in the solid secular, and not criminal in Paris.. " Secondly, the potential perpetrators from the attitude of the death penalty. It is difficult to death-not the death penalty deter crime in general people, we hope that should be for those who could be sentenced to death perpetrators of the potential psychological deterrent. 3. From practice inspection, there is no evidence that the death penalty for the crime have been effective deterrent. Since the 1920s, many foreign scholars on the death penalty and homicide crime rate of the relationship between a large number of research. There are two methods of use: The first one is the imposition of the death penalty in the country and abolition of the death penalty countries, or among the states with the death penalty abolition of the death penalty among states to compare the incidence of homicide, which is a horizontal comparison. The second is in the same country or within the same state to abolish the death penalty or restore the death penalty in the case before the homicide rate comparison, which is a longitudinal comparison. Most researchers of the report, denied that the retention of the death penalty and homicide a causal link between the crime rate, that is to say, the findings can not prove that the death penalty for the crime deterrence. Also studied the frequency of use of the death penalty and the incidence of homicide of the relationship between the results do not think that the relationship between the two. 4. Toward the Abolition of the death penalty is the world trend. As mentioned above, there are nearly two-thirds of the world's countries and territories have abolished the death penalty. 5. Economic development will wake up people for the value of life and respect for the concerns of That honor is adequate food and clothing, to improve the material, living contentedly in the warmth of the people in the state may be thinking, concerns and cherish the value of individual life, it is possible to form sympathizing tolerance sentiments, it may form a relatively rational concepts and retribution penalty values, abolition of the death penalty so that the resistance can be reduced and assistance to strengthen. 6. Rational thinking is the need of guidance and enlightenment. Instinct of revenge from human heart is the most deep-seated, one of the darkest corners. Sages have rational thinking to let the radiance illuminates those dark corners of the contemporary scholars of China's Criminal Law has an unshirkable responsibility
幸福航海家
去爱词霸找找吧1！1.With the rise in the level of awareness, we will find that the death penalty for serious crimes can not be an effective deterrent, even with the eradication of the death penalty to reduce crime, just a superstitious people. 2. From a theoretical point of view, the death penalty can not be an effective crime deterrent. "Troubled times heavy penalties" to deter crime deterrent misdemeanours thinking, as early as the Spring and Autumn period in China has been Legalists school of law thinkers as a crime prevention, govern the country classic. Modern Germany in accordance with the Criminal Law of Jurists Feuerbach's "compulsory psychological said," everyone has to avoid becoming music from instinct, as long as criminal penalties might bring enough people suffering, he would not choose crime. The death penalty to bring the perpetrators of pain is the biggest, of course, the perpetrators have the greatest psychological coercion, the perpetrator is the most effective deterrent. First of all, from the root of the crime. Crime is political in a certain society, the economy, culture, education, moral values, family relationships, etc. social factors interact with the perpetrators of the individual product. It is impossible to eradicate the death penalty have complex causes of crime, of course, but also can not fundamentally curb crime have. China late Qing Dynasty great jurist and legal reformer Shen this once pointed out: "Gou not of the heart, and full-time penalty, the side of justice, moving permanently criminal gang, and closes and the world, Yan Zai available?" On " the people Road, in the solid secular, and not criminal in Paris.. " Secondly, the potential perpetrators from the attitude of the death penalty. It is difficult to death-not the death penalty deter crime in general people, we hope that should be for those who could be sentenced to death perpetrators of the potential psychological deterrent. 3. From practice inspection, there is no evidence that the death penalty for the crime have been effective deterrent. Since the 1920s, many foreign scholars on the death penalty and homicide crime rate of the relationship between a large number of research. There are two methods of use: The first one is the imposition of the death penalty in the country and abolition of the death penalty countries, or among the states with the death penalty abolition of the death penalty among states to compare the incidence of homicide, which is a horizontal comparison. The second is in the same country or within the same state to abolish the death penalty or restore the death penalty in the case before the homicide rate comparison, which is a longitudinal comparison. Most researchers of the report, denied that the retention of the death penalty and homicide a causal link between the crime rate, that is to say, the findings can not prove that the death penalty for the crime deterrence. Also studied the frequency of use of the death penalty and the incidence of homicide of the relationship between the results do not think that the relationship between the two. 4. Toward the Abolition of the death penalty is the world trend. As mentioned above, there are nearly two-thirds of the world's countries and territories have abolished the death penalty. 5. Economic development will wake up people for the value of life and respect for the concerns of That honor is adequate food and clothing, to improve the material, living contentedly in the warmth of the people in the state may be thinking, concerns and cherish the value of individual life, it is possible to form sympathizing tolerance sentiments, it may form a relatively rational concepts and retribution penalty values, abolition of the death penalty so that the resistance can be reduced and assistance to strengthen. 6. Rational thinking is the need of guidance and enlightenment. Instinct of revenge from human heart is the most deep-seated, one of the darkest corners. Sages have rational thinking to let the radiance illuminates those dark corners of the contemporary scholars of China's Criminal Law has an unshirkable responsibility
