PK从来没赢过
The anti-monopoly law legislation purpose is for protecting fair competition in the market , range block of wood Ying Tai that system stipulates except suitable for use is big , is harmful for the fair competition order defending the socialism marketplace to compete for otherwise, Bu Li Yu all-round introduction competitive forces of the market. Specially appointed industry , specially appointed operator protected by it is to ensure that they gain the equal development chance , creates a fair competition's environment for them, the all the countries in the world anti-monopoly law complexity for adapting to an economic life, have worked out the regulation monopolizing and restricting do not including competing for behavior to a few. The country is based on peculiar need under peculiar situation, enterprise and some specially appointed content monopoly behavior being related to significant country benefit and common benefit of society to the part gives a law to the right of immunity apply to going ahead, to realize society overall beneficial result and to defend common benefit. System is the anti-monopoly law important component except suitable for use , whose legal sense is within the anti-monopoly law base and fundamental system system , stipulate that economy liberty , economy democracy and effective competition retire less important position out, abstract overall economy need and society overall beneficial result become main value taking the system to a kind of. Significance and the effect on society lie in its economy , allow to monopolize , allow to cooperate , allow to remove cut-throat competition in the marriage partner anti-monopoly law suitable for use is exempted, that the entirety sometimes to national economy develops the stability composing in reply society is beneficial. Although every country there exists difference in law, stipulate that system reflects internationalization and the unification tendency but in anti-monopoly law except suitable for use. The country is based on peculiar need under peculiar situation, enterprise and some specially appointed content monopoly behavior being related to significant country benefit and common benefit of society to the part gives a law to the right of immunity apply to going ahead, to realize society overall beneficial result and to defend common benefit, this is already become opposing the rational exceptive clause monopolizing a kind of legislation. But the modern economic life is diverse and confused complicated, the upper monopoly of marketplace form is respectively different , the effect degree to economic growth differs from one another , must build a kind of except suitable for use therefore affirming principle, with the guide enforcing the law as legislation sum. General Er Yan , oppose the basic monopolizing law having two's to affirm principle: Principle breaking the law first per se; Two is rational principle. So long as the enterprise marketplace occupies more than certain principle finger proportion breaking the law per se, whose concrete behavior is illegal right away by the disabled category of law , consider but an impact of them over marketplace unnecessarily synthetically; Rational principle demands only when behind judging an impact of the behavior monopolizing and the state monopolizing over marketplace all round , ability ascertains if their break the law. With the fact that the anti-monopoly law gauge makes the marriage partner reason structuralism turn around to the behaviourism,rational principle has had preferential position gradually. The norm analysis , demonstration applying analyse the main body of a book , various research method such as analysis , economy analysis comparatively, the structure from the system there existing a problem in system except fundamental system theory , general situation , our country anti-monopoly law that the system legislation sum applies to except country anti-monopoly law is other suitable for use are suitable for use except suitable for use except analysis and our country anti-monopoly law are suitable for use is built waiting for several aspect to have discussed this one system. The system concept and their main characteristic has carried out macroscopic introduction except the primo , the main body of a book are applied to anti-monopoly law , make of having removed everybody tier on the surface in concept has been divergent. The system rationale has carried out analysis except two aspect applies to secondary economics and science of law to anti-monopoly law , has testified rationality and theory significance that anti-monopoly law there exists in system except suitable for use. The secondary , the main body of a book have adopt comparison go into method , system has inspected the country who several has mature anti-monopoly law system in the world (American-Germany-Japan) applying to does not include system legislation and actual judicial practice, have been that the system existence has establish theory and the practice basis except anti-monopoly law is suitable for use thereby , have analysed whose evolution trend. And thirdly, have set forth our country opposing fundamental system regulation monopolizing law except suitable for use, system have problem has carried out analysis on our country except anti-monopoly law is suitable for use. Final, and be tied in wedlock our national condition on basis exempting common character in every country , analysing our country there existing problem in system except anti-monopoly law is suitable for use in summary,suggestion having suggested that again structure build our country opposes the system monopolizing law except suitable for use.
优质英语培训问答知识库