再遇见67
英语辩论赛活动流程
在前1-4环节中,对方可以根据发言者正在申诉的论点提出本方的观点(point of information,简称为POI)提问者提出POI的注意事项:以下是我为大家整理分享的英语辩论赛活动流程，欢迎阅读参考。
1、主席致辞：宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料；介绍选手包括学院、专业、年级及正反方所持观点等；介绍评委及比赛规则。
2.、比赛阶段：
1)正方一辩发言（7分钟）
第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第六分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时---举牌提示
2）反方一辩发言（8分钟）
第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示
3）正方二辩发言（8分钟）
第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示
4）反方二辩发言（8分钟）
第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示
5）反方一辩总结（4分钟）
第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第三分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时---举牌提示
6）正方一辩总结（5分钟）
第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时--举牌提示,第五分钟结束时---举牌提示
注意事项:
在提示牌提示结束后,有20秒宽限期,发言者必须在此期间内完成自己的.发言,如果超过宽限期,则扣分.如果发言者发言时间远远少于规定时间,则评委会将此看作没有充分展开自己的观点而给发言者扣分.
在前1-4环节中,对方可以根据发言者正在申诉的论点提出本方的观点(point of information,简称为POI)提问者提出POI的注意事项:
1）POI要简短，切题，机智。严禁针对比赛规则和个人提出问题；
2）提出POI时要从座位上起立，并举手示意.提问者可以用类似on that point,Sir/Madam的话引起发言者的注意；
3）发言者可以采取以下方式回应对方提出的POI:语言拒绝(类似sorry)、接受提问（类似ok）；
4）如果提出POI的要求被发言者接受，那么POI的陈述要以澄清事实或提出评论为形式，用一两句话在15秒内表达出来；如果被发言者拒绝，那么提问者坐回原位，准备下一次提问；
5）POI只能在前四个环节中提出，最后两个环节不能提出，前四个环节内第一分钟和最后一分钟内不可以提出POI；
6）发言者如果接受POI，那么就应针对提问并围绕自己的发言回答问题；
7）除非要提出POI，否则没有轮到发言的辩手不得在别人发言时起立。如果辩手违反规则提问或有扰乱正常比赛的行为，那么此选手将被主持人宣布犯规；
8）评价POI的提出是否得当，应该看它对正反两方接下来的辩论的影响如何；
9）发言者在发言时须至少接受2次POI，提问者至少要站起4次示意提POI。辩手若没有抓住机会提POI或者在发言中没有接受POI，评委可酌情扣分；
3、观众提问:观众可向正反方各提一个问题，由双方选派一名选手作答。该环节在正式比赛结束后进行，增加比赛观赏性，不影响比赛结果。
4、评判团评议裁决：由一名评委进行点评，向辩论赛主席递交比赛结果。附评分标准
5、评分标准
1)内容:观点陈述明确，有条理，论点和论据内容是否正确、充实，引用资料和实例是否恰当。 30%
2)技巧:语言连贯，反应迅速，辩手语言是否流畅，说理、分析是否透彻，反驳和应变能力是否强，说服力和逻辑性是否强。 20%
3)各队在POI环节中的识辩能力、说明能力和逻辑性是否强，接句是否合适，回答是否中肯，反驱是否有力、有理，反应是否机敏，用语是否得体。 20%
4)遵守比赛规则，准确把握时间。 10%
5)形象气质：仪表，着装整齐辩手的表情、动作是否恰当，是否有风度及幽默感。 10%
6)团队合作：全队各辩手的论点是否一致，结构是否完整，队员之间的配合、合作是否默契。 10%
笑脸笑脸笑脸
辩论赛流程英文版
A, shall be borne by the chairman of the debate
1, the debate began
2, announced the motion
3, introduce the participating team and its position
4, introduce team member
5, introduce rules, judges and staff
6, debate competition
7, the judges review
8, for audience questions, the judges score (simultaneous)
9, announced the result of the match
The debate over 10
Second, the process of the debate
1, the theoretical stage defense:
(1) positive and argue against a speech made by positive and negative sides ZhuBian stated his own first main point. Must be completed within the specified time.
(2) positive and opposite two apology speech square 2, against two contend with concise text focuses theoretically demonstrated their own point of view,
(3) positive and opposite three speech by square three, against three respectively with concise text carries on the empirical analysis, provide arguments to support his own views.
Phase 2, free debate by tetragonal speak first, then the opposition spokesman, sides took turns to speak. (in a relatively concentrated period of time)
3, summarize four contend for final statement by both parties, summarizes has side view, refute each other subjective point:
(1) argue against four summation
(2) square four summation
4. Audience member: the audience to questions of both players, players must give the answer patiently. Stage performance is not recorded in the results of the competition between the two sides to ask a question.
5, the judges scoring stage
6, the judges review the process of both views and debate.
7, the announcement
Three, the rules of the debate
1, each member must be finished within the prescribed period of time, over time, in accordance with abstained processing, and lose from team total score 5 points.
2, free debate rules free debate speech must alternates between the teams, the first to speak with a member of tetragonal, then one by opposition players, the two sides take turns, until you run out of time. (each a free debate in the concentration of two hours to complete, what time each other, each stick words between 60-800 words, can only ask a question at a time.)
Fourth, criteria
(a) will be hired to review all the five judges of the game.
(2) criteria
1, point clear, argument is sufficient, citing appropriate, analyzed thoroughly.
2, grabbed the other views and error, precedents and precise, and to the point.
3, reflect agile, strong ability to deal with.
4, articulate, level clear, tight logic.
(3) the scoring method (group and individual scores respectively, out of 100)
(1) the topic: can the logic, theory, from the position held by the fact that such as multi-level and multi-angle, argument is sufficient, reasoning is clear, whether for his own difficulties with effective treatment methods.
(2) the argument: if there is a convincing argument, argument is sufficient, whether logical reasoning process, the fact whether the reference is proper, true.
(3) dispute: to ask whether to grab the key, the problem simple. No questions or questions within the time required, should be appropriate. The question of whether or not to answer each other, can you give a person the sense with justified. Don't answer or not answer should be penalised accordingly.
(4) : whether to have team spirit, mutual support, debate cohesion is closely. Whether q&a form an organic whole, to a powerful blow to the other party.
(5) argue the wind: the language and debate style exquisite civility. Personal attacks will be made to argue each other friends and netizens.
(4) points: every topic, argument, dispute, cooperate, argue the wind project, do not conform to the requirements of the evaluation and in violation of the rules, are appropriate. Due to the fault causes of incidents affect the game, is decided by the jury, in a 5-10% reduction of its cumulative total score.
(5) score project group and individual points per game comparison table is as follows:
(6) score project group and individual points per game of appraisal form
(7) good debater respectively by the outcome of each race scores are the highest return. The game of "best debater" tired integral calculation by the individual scores the highest gain, formula is: the total integral/attend the session.
(8) the outcome of judgment
1, the outcome of the game, on the basis of a few judges play group points, remove the a and a minimum points, calculating the remaining points scored an average of judgement.
2, debater individual scoring points calculation method, calculation method with groups only as an individual award review basis, has nothing to do with judging each outcome.
Five, awards and incentives
1, every game are selected each a good debater each team, will decide after the game one of the best debater.
一、由辩论会主席承担
