海鲜饭泡粥
灰姑娘的故事老套吗?不!自夏尔·佩罗创作这个故事起它就一直被广为流传,并永远会是孩子们的睡前童话伴其酣睡,迪士尼此次真人版《灰姑娘》,没有搞怪另类,也没有反派正话,就是温故着那个经典的童话故事,让那曾几何时的童梦仿若触手可及。 就《灰姑娘》言,这是一部无需论其剧情的电影,其几近百分百的忠于了那以是人尽皆知的原著,未有何创新,也不曾删改,有所出入的也仅是微乎其微的旁枝末节,一切的发展皆如那往昔的童话,梦幻与华美的交织,一颗善良坚韧的心,令人至始至终皆能感怀灰姑娘那满若朝阳面对生活的态度,这使得即便是反派的继母与姐妹,看那夸张荒诞的表演,也未有觉恶俗,而是令人不禁宛然一笑,好坏善恶在电影中一眼既能辨别而出,某种程度上可以说电影欠缺了份波澜新颖,但一个如此忠于原著的童话故事,简单而纯粹的美好本就是其本态。 作为改编电影,《灰姑娘》也做出了细微处的改动,让"后妈"更有戏,凯特·布兰切特作为昔日的精灵女王和凭借《蓝色茉莉》揽获奥斯卡影后的她,气质与演技的兼顾将这个因痛失两任丈夫的继母贵妇演绎的张力十足,而灰姑娘的主场或因仅只是按部就班,反倒令人难寻太多亮点,令人不禁有以些许宣兵夺主的味道,在背景特效上,已然不是第一次改编真人版童话的迪士尼已然是轻车熟路,宫廷与田园两种风格配以那梦幻的南瓜车童话桥段,其种种皆有以极高的还原度。 孩子看童话看到的是真善美,而大人看童话很多人则夹杂了世俗的功利,所以或许有人会过度解读电影中的灰姑娘实则是现实中的心机绿茶,也有所谓的专家学者认为灰姑娘的故事是以貌取人,给孩子带来了错误的导向,当我们得出这些观点的时候,其实已然失去了一个如孩子般的童心,将自已站于那世俗的顶点俯视着这个童话,所以灰姑娘的故事或许能取悦孩子,但那份天真的“幼稚”可能已然很难打动多少大人的心房,电影工业特效的进步已然能让这个童话逼真到无瑕绝美,而我们所需,仅只是重拾童心,找回儿时那份久违的质朴。 电影中支撑灰姑娘一路走来的是母亲临终前告诫女儿的“坚强和勇敢,仁慈和善良”,温故拾心,面对这样一个不能再老套的美好童话,拾起的不仅是童心,更是那面对生活心若朝阳的初心。Is Cinderella's story old-fashioned? No Since Charles Pero created this story, it has been widely spread, and will always be the children's bedtime fairy tales with their soundly sleeping, and Disney's real life version of Cinderella, no strange or negative, is the classic fairy tale, which makes the old children's dreams come to hand. . As for Cinderella, this is a film that does not need to talk about its plot. It is nearly 100% loyal to the original book that is known to everyone. There is no innovation, no deletion, and only a little bypass. All developments are like the old words of the past, the interweaving of dreams and beauty, a good good. Good and tenacious heart, from the beginning to the end, can feel the attitude of Cinderella that full of the sun to face life, which makes even the villainous stepmother and sister, the exaggerated and absurd performance, and no vulgar, but a funny smile, good and bad good and evil in the film can be discernable to some extent. The movie is short of new waves, but a fairy tale that is so faithful to the original is simple and pure. As a film adaptation, Cinderella also made subtle changes to make the "stepmother" more dramatic. Kate Blanchett, a former elves queen and her "blue Jasmine", took Oscar after her, the temperament and the performance of the two husband's wife who lost her husband's stepmother the tension, and grey aunt. Niang's home or because it is only in order, but it is difficult to find too many bright spots, it can not help but have a bit of the taste of the army to seize the Lord, in the background special effect, not the first adaptation of the fairy tale of Disney is already a road, court and pastoral two styles with the fantasy pumpkin cart fairy bridge, its seed The species has a high degree of reduction. Children see the fairy tale is true, good and beautiful, and adults see many people in fairy tales are mixed with worldly utilitarianism, so maybe some people will overinterpret Cinderella in the movie is real green tea in reality, and there are experts and scholars who think that Cinderella's story is to judge people by appearance and to bring wrong guidance to the children. When they come to these views, they have lost a child like childlike innocence, standing at the vertex of the world and overlooking the fairy tale, so the story of Cinderella may be able to please children, but that naive "naive" may have been hard to move a lot of adults, and the film industry has progresses. But we can make this fairy tale realistic and flawless and beautiful, and what we need is just to regain childishness and find the long and unsophisticated simplicity of childhood. In the film, the support of Cinderella is the "strength and courage, kindness and kindness" of her daughter before his mother's death.
最爱尛草莓
It is a tough bet to retell a story which has already been told not once but many number of times. We all know what happens in Cinderella, but it would take Disney to make an already known story to be interesting. The way this version of Cinderella has been told makes all the difference. Disney and Fairy tales are made for each other so much, that no matter how many times they tell the same story, it is still as interesting as watching it for the first time. Throw in some top class CGI to the fairy tale, and voila you have a stunning movie, and yes the movie was stunning, be it the palace, which i believe was CGI, the performances by the artists and above all the screenplay had been extremely well written all over the movie. Thankfully this one is not a musical like its predecessor, from Disney.So full marks to the director Kenneth Branagh, and full scores to Lily James for portraying the most loved character of all times. Also a special mention to the characterization of the prince,played by Madden, that rather than being portrayed as the lover boy Prince Charming, who just falls in love over Cinderella, in this version he shows his character by standing up for his love.
非非1227
I ABOUT THE AUTHOR John Ronald Reuel Tolkien was born on January 3, 1892, in Bloemfontein, South Africa, where his father was a bank manager. After his father’s death, Ronald, then aged four, his mother, and younger brother moved to the English village of Sarehole, in the West Midlands. Thereafter, Tolkien always retained an idealized image of the Sarehole Mill, its old mill pool and overhanging willow tree, a tempting nearby mushroom patch, and the local clusters of cottages—all of which figured in his picture of Hobbiton. At this time young Ronald was already discovering two interests that were to shape his life: languages and stories about imaginary places. When his mother moved the family to Birmingham, the urban atmosphere with its trains and factories was much more forbidding and he later encouraged people to "escape" from such environments through imaginative literature. During his years at King Edward's school in Birmingham and later at Oxford University, Tolkien concentrated on philology, moving from languages such as Latin, Greek, German, and French, to Old and Middle English, Gothic, Old Norse, Welsh, and Finnish. During his childhood Tolkien had started "making up" languages and as an undergraduate at Oxford he continued this practice, evolving from Finnish and Welsh what eventually became the languages of the elves in Middle Earth. His work with the signal corps of the British army from 1916 to 1918 during World War I stretched his linguistic talents in a different direction. After the war Tolkien worked briefly on the Oxford English Dictionary, before moving into the profession in which he was to spend the rest of his life: teaching. He was first invited to join the English department at Leeds University; five years later he became a professor of Anglo-Saxon at Oxford, a position he held for 34 years. At Oxford he did much to demonstrate the strong bonds between what had been two rival fields: language and literature. Among his academic works medievalists have consistently praised his translation of the Middle English poetic romance Sir Gawain and the Green Knight and the posthumously published translations of The Pearl and Sir Orfeo. It is significant that the most prominent of his many studies in Anglo-Saxon literature should be his published lecture on "Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics" (1936). As a child Tolkien had loved dragon stories and the anonymous Anglo-Saxon Beowulf-poet created one of the greatest dragons of literature, a model for Tolkien's treasure-loving dragons in The Hobbit and Farmer Giles of Ham, as well as his creation of malice and terror, Glaurung of The Silmarillion. Throughout his life, Tolkien was drawn to the challenge of creating an imagined world and mythology. In the 1920s, while he was busy with his teaching career, he was also playfully creating "fairy-stories" to entertain his children. It was for them that The Hobbit evolved, episode by episode. When they grew out of listening to stories, Tolkien's motivation to create them stopped, and so did Bilbo's quest. It was not until 1937 that Tolkien completed the novel. The overwhelming popularity of The Hobbit led his publisher to request another book about hobbits. Tolkien began a sequel almost immediately, but The Fellowship of the Ring, the first part of The Lord of the Rings trilogy, did not see print until 1954, 17 years after he had written the first chapter. The world of Middle Earth came to full form in The Lord of the Rings trilogy, but its underlying mythology continued to grow throughout Tolkien's life. After his retirement from Oxford in 1959 he concentrated on preparing for publication manuscripts that went back as far as his schoolboy song about Earendil (1914). Up until his death on September 2, 1973, he was still revising—and re-revising—the manuscripts, which were finally edited and published by his son Christopher in The Silmarillion (1977). Tolkien's own absorption in these myths is reflected by the inscriptions on his and his wife's gravestones: "Beren" and "Luthien", the names of the human-elven couple from whom the great lines of Middle Earth descend. II OVERVIEW In The Lord of the Rings Tolkien demonstrates the evolution of a literary world. In The Hobbit, often considered a prologue to the trilogy, he created a kind of being with no parallel in literature; in the trilogy he expands his single hobbit hero into four hobbit companions and an assortment of helpers and enemies. The character of Bilbo from The Hobbit returns in The Fellowship of the Ring, the first volume of the trilogy. The central adventure of the trilogy spans three volumes, each divided into two books. Each of the six books builds to its own climactic ending, but an intricate system of interlacing allows the reader to move easily with the characters as the author fills in more details about the geography of Middle Earth, the history of its inhabitants, and the progress of the quest. The expansive background against which the central action takes place conveys a sense of the universality of the conflict between good and evil. In this world everyone needs the support of others in overcoming obstacles and in doing good. Many of the background sections treat the nature of evil as a distortion of what could have been good. Basic to the history of the One Ring is the thirst for power of its creator, Sauron. In the central volume of the trilogy, The Two Towers, the desire for the power inherent in the Ring has also corrupted the wizard Saruman. Tolkien's analysis of the corrupting nature of power explains why three of his strongest forces for good—Gandalf, Galadriel, and Aragorn—refuse to take the Ring and why Bilbo is unable to resist its control. As the story develops, one major source of Bilbo’s nephew Frodo's internal conflict lies in the pull of the ring itself. The success of Frodo's quest flows from mercy, friendship, endurance, and the courage to risk life and happiness for the good of others. III SETTING Physically Middle Earth resembles modern Earth. It is the inhabitants that add the touch of unreality that a reader expects in what Tolkien calls a "secondary" world. In making a world for his hobbits, elves, wizards, dwarves, ents, orcs, ringwraiths, and other unusual beings, Tolkien assumes the creative rights that he says in his essay "On Fairy-stories" belong to the storyteller: the right to be free with nature; to use the world as a basis to make something new, while giving this new world its principles of inner consistency. Much of the mythology and history of Middle Earth comes through songs that pervade the narrative, but a more organized "history", complete with dates for the four ages of Middle Earth and genealogies of major families of elves, dwarves, hobbits, and human beings, is included as an appendix to the third volume. IV THEMES AND CHARACTERS The enduring conflict between good and evil is the underlying theme of the trilogy, but Tolkien develops other themes in connection with it. He explores the positive and negative sides of power, the nature of heroism, and the role of friendship. To Frodo Baggins, favourite nephew of the ring-finder Bilbo Baggins, is entrusted the task of saving Middle Earth from the control of the master of evil, Sauron. Frodo's task reverses the basic quest pattern: instead of finding a treasure, Frodo is sent to destroy what Sauron values above all—the One Ring. Sauron has poured much of his power into the One Ring to strengthen his control over the 19 Rings of Power. Of these 19 rings, only the Three made by the elves for themselves have never been touched by Sauron and his evil. The Seven, originally distributed to dwarf leaders, have been destroyed and do not affect events in the trilogy. The major concentration of evil confronted by Frodo comes from the Ringwraiths, or Nazgul, who are men enslaved by Sauron through the Nine Rings. Sauron, having learned from Gollum the whereabouts of the One Ring, sends the Nazgul to recover it. Since the defeat in which the Ring was cut from his hand, Sauron himself can no longer assume a physical form. He can, however, act through those who have submitted their minds and wills to his service. The nature of the Rings of Power and of the Ringwraiths is made clear to Frodo before he accepts responsibility for destroying the Ring. The wizard Gandalf and Elrond, great leader of the elves of Middle Earth, determine who will accompany Frodo on his quest. To match the number of Nazgul, they include nine individuals in the Fellowship of the Ring, representing the people of Middle Earth: four hobbits (Frodo, his servant Sam, and two young friends, Pippin and Merry); the elf Legolas; the dwarf Gimli; two men, Aragorn and Boromir; and Gandalf himself. The fellows all demonstrate some aspect of heroism. Gandalf has an aura of supernatural power. He risks his life and his power when he is pitted against other supernatural forces: his fellow wizard Saruman, turned evil by desire for the Ring; the Balrog of Moria, who leads him to at least a symbolic death; and the Lord of the Nazgul, who is reinforced by the great strength of Sauron. Gandalf’s heroism is beyond human imitation. Human heroes abound in the trilogy: Aragorn, Boromir, his brother Faramir, the aged Theoden, Eowyn and Eomer (Theoden's niece and nephew), and the many warriors of Rohan and Gondor. Boromir at one point yields to the power of the Ring, trying to take it from Frodo, but he recognizes his weakness almost immediately and dies defending the younger hobbits, Pippin and Merry. Aragorn, descended from two great marriages of elves and mortals, has a grace and power beyond that of mere human leaders. With this heritage he seems like one of the great epic heroes of the past, just as Tolkien's trilogy itself at times echoes the heroic epic world. Aragorn plans, leads, encourages, and heals; he is always ready to risk his life for the salvation of others. When the royal line of the great kings of the West is "returned" to power by him, the free peoples of Middle Earth can again find justice and the age of men can begin. The most "human" heroes are the four hobbits. Although at first they do not fully understand the dangers of the quest, their commitment grows in proportion to their knowledge of the nature of their enemies. Frodo undergoes the greatest test because the forces of Sauron concentrate their attacks on him. He is also tested by the Ring, by Gollum whom a lesser hero might have killed for his own safety, and by physical strain. Although Frodo at the last moment yields to the evil pull of the ring, he is saved by his own virtue: the pity that had spared Gollum. Frodo carries a sword, but he rarely uses it, except when he futilely strikes at the Lord of Nazgul; his heroism lies more in endurance than in battle. Sam, like his master, endures, but he is called to fight against Gollum, Shelob, and the orcs. He delights in hearing the orcs misidentify him as a great elven warrior. Sam's major role in the trilogy is that of loyal friend. However, he is also the voice of normality, longing for the beauty of home, his family and friends in the Shire, his garden, and his pots and pans. Like Sam, Pippin and Merry exemplify friendship and heroism on a more attainable level. They are too small to fight the orcs who capture them, but they outwit them and travel with Fangorn and the ents to overcome Saruman. Back in the Shire after the destruction of the ring, Sam, Pippin, and Merry all share in the battle against more "normal" enemies: mere men. Neither Elrond nor Galadriel participate in the quest, but they do contribute to its outcome. Elrond's power rescues Frodo from the Nazgul attack and his wound; and it is at Elrond's home that the fellowship is formed. Galadriel's gifts, especially Frodo's phial of light and the seeds of new life in Sam's box, symbolize the life-giving nature of the elves. When Galadriel later tells Frodo that the destruction of the One Ring will probably destroy the power of the Three Rings, it becomes clear how much the elves are sacrificing for the success of the quest. The 19 Rings of Power made by the elves of old had originally been formed as objects of goodness and beauty; it was Sauron who turned the rings he touched into sources of evil. Tolkien demonstrates how goodness can be perverted into evil, but he also shows that evil in turn can be overcome. In his preface to the trilogy, Tolkien distinguishes between allegory and the applicability of works of literature to life. While he disclaims having imposed any allegorical significance on his story, he asserts the right of readers to apply the meaning of the story to their own lives as they see fit. In light of this disclaimer, it seems contrary to Tolkien’s intention to interpret The Lord of the Rings as political or social allegory, as some critics have done. On the other hand, readers of all generations can apply to their own age some of the overall principles embodied in the trilogy. The fact, for example, that elves, dwarves, hobbits, and human beings can set aside major differences to work together for the welfare of Middle Earth can be extended to a hope that modern human races can set aside their differences, no more deeply embedded than the distrust between dwarves and elves. Many battles take place in Middle Earth—often violent and bloody ones. The heroes fight bravely, sometimes against terrible odds, but the "good" characters do not rejoice in fighting, except perhaps when Fangorn and the ents delight in overthrowing the tree destroyers, Saruman and his orcs, or when Legolas and Gimli compete over the number of orcs slain. Before the Battle of Bywater, after the return to the Shire, Frodo directs his companions to avoid killing their enemies if possible. Even Saruman would have been spared if his own cruelty had not provoked the enslaved Grima to turn against him. Evil is readily recognizable by its ugliness and by its fruits. Goodness is equally recognizable and its fruits are more lasting. The author does not preach, but his good characters exemplify in action the virtues of mercy, perseverance, generosity, and friendship. Sauron, Saruman, and the Ringwraiths all embody the vices of hatred, greed, and the thirst for power. The influence of Sauron on those who once were normal men demonstrates the pervasiveness of evil, as does the ugliness of Sauron's land, Mordor. While the destruction of Sauron and the Ringwraiths suggests that evil can be overcome, it does not imply that the destruction of a major source of evil eliminates all evil. The Southrons continue to fight after Sauron's power has collapsed, Saruman's petty destroyers of good continue their work in the Shire, and Aragorn finds it necessary to establish guardians for his borders. Middle Earth after Sauron is no utopia, but it is a world very much like ours, one worth cultivating to bring forth beauty and goodness. In Gondor and in the Shire hope lives on.