guodong930
中学生面试一般都是比较简单的话题,比如WhatdoyouususllydoonSundays?,Whatkindofsportdoyoulike?,Whatjobdoyouwanttakeinthefuture...类似这些日常的话题都可能是面试的考题,不会太难的,放心吧。看来你们的老师还是很注重你们对英语的日常应用,那你就在网上找一些今年发生的大事件来做做准备,比如奥运会啊,四川地震这些。加油哦
Lucia慢半拍
英语口语面试常见十二大话题
考试就要开始了,对还有什么不了解的呢?为考生们提供各种面试、学习、择校等技巧及经验,希望可以帮助大家考得好成绩。在这里预祝大家考出理想成绩。
话题一:个人情况(Personal information)
能够向他人介绍个人的基本情况(姓名、年龄、出生日期、家庭成员、电话号码、爱好、邮箱地址、外貌、特征和自己的生活情况等),并能够写出自己简单的基本情况。
能够听懂他人的有关个人信息,并且记录简单信息。
话题二:家庭(Family and home)
能够介绍家庭成员(姓名、年龄、职业、外貌特征、爱好等)的基本信息。
能够利用所学的语言,互相询问有关对方家庭的基本情况。
能够简单地写出家庭成员的基本信息。
能够介绍家庭住房的各种房间的名称,并能简单描述部分室内的物品。
能够简单介绍家庭成员平时经常在这些房间做的事情。
尝试着设计自己梦想中的卧室,调查同学家里房间的拥有情况。
话题三:学校(Schoollife)
能够介绍自己的学校生活(学校名称、任课教师、专业教室的名称等)。
能够介绍自己的学习科目,喜欢和不喜欢的科目,并能简单单说明理由。
能够向他人介绍自己的课程表,并设计自己喜欢的课程表。
话题四:朋友(Friends)
能够简单介绍自己的朋友(姓名、年龄、外貌特征、爱好等)。
能够简单地写出朋友的主要信息。
话题五:天气(Weather)
能够谈论有关天气情况。
能够听懂简单的天气预报,并记录相关的'信息。
能够根据天气情况,设计自己的活动计划(合适的着装、活动去向、活动目的等)。
话题六:饮食(Food and drink)
能够表达自己喜欢和不喜欢的食物,并简单说明理由。
能够简单介绍自己一日三餐的饮食。
能够根据自己的喜好,为自己或他人点餐。
知道什么是良好的饮食习惯。
初步了解中西方关于饮食文化的差异。
话题七:动物(Animals)
能够表达自己喜欢和不喜欢的动物,并说出为什么。
能够描述动物的外貌特征以及它们的习性。
话题八:购物(Shopping)
能够询问物品的价格。
能够描述自己对所需物品的看法(如颜色、尺寸、大小等)。
能够帮助顾客选择喜欢的商品,提出自己的建议。
能够设计购物清单,进行合理的购物。
话题九:节假日(Holidays and Festivals)
能够介绍自己节假日的安排、打算,并询问他人的相关计划。
能够简单描述自己渡过的一个节假日的活动,如生日晚会等。
能够初步了解中西方不同的节日,并知道如何相互表示祝贺。
能够表达自己喜欢的节日,并简单地说明理由。
话题十:日常生活(Dailylife)
能够介绍自己一天的生活起居。
能够说出一天当中在什么时间通常应该做的事情。
能够说出自己的计划、打算以及准备进行的课外活动。
话题十一:文体活动(Activities)
能够介绍自己的业余活动和业余爱好。
能够介绍自己喜欢和不喜欢的运动,并说明理由。
能够简单描述自己最近参加的一次最有意义的活动。
话题十二:健康和习惯(Health and Habits)
能够介绍自己的生活习惯。
能够说明自己的身体哪里不适。
能够询问他人的身体健康状况。
能够给他人提出合理的健康建议。
以上是英语口语面试十二大话题,读后您收获多少呢?
爱上家装饰
ViTalk旅游英语(vxyy515)原创文章,转载请联系我们授权 ·用英语聊天的时候,你知道该如何悄悄转变聊天的话题么?英语口语话题200篇如果是和别人正在聊天,但是聊到了你不想谈论的话题,不想让气氛尴尬的话,我们肯定不能说:· Shut up! 闭嘴!· Button it, can't you? 闭上嘴,行吗?因为这两种说法都是比较粗鲁地让人“闭嘴”。(当然,在特定环境下,你可以选择对极其无礼的人报以同样态度。)我们一般会用以下口语很直接地表达不想谈论,要求转移话题:I think we should change the subject.我觉得我们应该换个话题。I wish you'd talk about something else.我希望你换个话题。※ subject:(谈话或书籍的)主题、话题、问题等。文章来源ViTalk旅游英语(vxyy515),禁止二次修改或私自转载!如果不方便直接拒绝对方,我们可以委婉地转变令人尴尬无语的话题,让对话双方都能继续愉快的聊下去。技巧1:顺便说说或另外说说,改变话题By the way,……顺便说下,……So,on another topic,……那么在另一个话题上……技巧2:当成是玩笑,改变话题方向Well, all joking aside.好了,玩笑到此为止。Let's get back to the subject.让我们言归正传。 技巧
土偶寄宿制
你这个题目很宽泛。。有个英语辩论赛技巧的帖子,希望能对你有用 On Debating Clarity: Avoiduse of terms which can be interpreted differently by different readers.When we are talking to people who substantially agree with us we canuse such terms as "rednecks" or "liberals" and feel reasonably surethat we will be understood. But in a debate, we are talking to peoplewho substantially disagree with us and they are likely to put adifferent interpretation on such words. Evidence:Quoting an authority is not evidence. Quoting a majority opinion is notevidence. Any argument that starts with, "According to Einstein..." isnot based on objective evidence. Any argument that starts with, "Mostbiologists believe..." is not based on objective evidence. Saying, "TheBible says..." is not evidence. Authorities and majorities can be wrongand frequently have been. (历届辩论赛中出现最多的问题) Emotionalism: Avoidemotionally charged words--words that are likely to produce more heatthan light. Certainly the racial, ethnic, or religious hate words haveno place in rational debating. Likewise, avoid argumentum ad hominem.Personal attacks on your opponent are an admission of intellectualbankruptcy. Also, slurs directed at groups with whom your opponent isidentified are usually nonproductive. Try to keep attention centered onthe objective problem itself. There is a special problem when debatingsocial, psychological, political, or religious ideas because a person'stheories about these matters presumably have some effect on his ownlife style. In other words, rather than saying "and that's why you aresuch an undisciplined wreck" say, "a person adopting your position is,I believe, likely to become an undisciplined wreck because ..." Causality: Avoid the blunder of asserting a causal relationship with the popular fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hocwhich declares that because some event A happened and immediatelyafterward event B happened that event A was the cause of event B.(Iknew someone whose car stalled on the way to work. She would get outand open the hood and slam it and then the car would start. Singing asong would have been just as effective to allow time for a vapor lockto dissipate!) Also avoid the popular fallacy that correlation provescausation. People who own Cadillacs, on average, have higher incomesthan people who don't. This does not mean that if we provided peoplewith Cadillacs that they would have higher incomes. Innuendo(影射):Innuendois saying something pejorative about your opponent without coming rightout and saying it but by making more or less veiled allusions to somecircumstance, rumor, or popular belief. If you want to see someexcellent examples of innuendo, watch Rush Limbaugh. Politicians are,unfortunately, frequently guilty of using innuendo. It is an easy wayto capitalize on popular prejudices without having to make explicitstatements which might be difficult or impossible to defend againstrational attack. Besure of your facts. What is the source of your information? If it is anewspaper or a magazine, are you sure that the information hasn't been"slanted" to agree with that publication's political bias? Wherecrucial facts are concerned, it is best to check with more than onesource. Often international publications will give you a differentperspective than your hometown newspaper. Check to see whether the bookyou are using was published by a regular publishing company or whetherit was published by some special interest group like the John BirchSociety or a religious organization. These books cannot be trusted topresent unbiased evidence since their motivation for publishing is nottruth but rather the furtherance of some political or religious view. Understandyour opponents' arguments. It is good practice to argue with a friendand take a position with which you do not agree. In this way you maydiscover some of the assumptions your opponents are making which willhelp you in the debate. Remember that everybody thinks that hisposition is the right one, and everybody has his reasons for thinkingso. Do not impute ridiculous or malevolent ideas to your opponent. An example of this is the rhetorical statement, "Haveyou stopped beating your wife?" This imputes or presupposes that youropponent has beaten his wife. One frequently sees references byconservative speakers and writers to the idea that gay activists want"special privileges." This would be ridiculous if it were true. Itisn't true, but speaking as if it were true and well known to all isegregiously unfair to listeners or readers who may not be wellinformed. It is probably always wise to treat your opponent withrespect, even if he doesn't deserve it. If he doesn't deserve respect,this will probably soon become obvious enough. Regression to the mean(逻辑退化):Another source of error which occurs very frequently is the failure totake into account regression to the mean. This is a bit technical, butit is very important, especially in any kind of social or psychologicalresearch which depends upon statistical surveys or even experimentswhich involve statistical sampling. Rather than a general statement ofthe principle (which becomes more and more unintelligible as thestatement becomes more and more rigorous) an example will be used. Let's consider intelligence testing. 1.Perhaps we have a drug that is supposed to raise the IQ of mentallyretarded kids. So we give a thousand intelligence tests and select the30 lowest scoring individuals. 2. We then give these low scoring kids our drug and test them again. 3. We find that there has been an increase in the average of their IQ scores. 4. Is this evidence that the drug increased the IQ? Notnecessarily! Suppose we want to show that smoking marijuana lowers theIQ. Well, we take the 30 highest scoring kids in our sample and givethem THC and test them again. We find a lower average IQ. Is this evidence that marijuana lowers the IQ? Notnecessarily! Any statistician knows that if you make some kind of ameasurement of some attribute of a large sample of people and thenselect the highest and lowest scoring individuals and make the samemeasurement again, the high scoring group will have a lower averagescore and the low scoring group will have a higher average score thanthey did the first time. This is called "regression to the mean" and itis a perfectly universal statistical principle. Thereare undoubtedly more points to be made here. Suggestions will begratefully received. Larry has made the following suggestions: · Apply the scientific method. (运用科学方法) · Cite relevant personal experience. (合理引用相关的个人经历) · Be polite. (辩论过程中有礼待人) · Organize your response. (Beginning, middle, end.) (对你辩词进行合理的组织) · Treat people as individuals.· Cite sources for statistics and studies used. · Literacy works. Break posts into sentences and paragraphs. · Read the post you are responding to. Stay open to learning
咣咣中奖
适用于小组讨论或聊天用的20个英语口语话题英语口语频道为网友整理的《适用于小组讨论或聊天用的20个英语口语话题》,供大家参考学习。下面是20个英语口语话题,适用于和朋友或者小组讨论聊天用。Breakfast is the most important meal of the day.Swimming in the ocean is better than swimming in a public pool.Alcohol should be illegal.Children should provide room and board for their aging parents.Studying grammar is more important than practising conversation skills.Television is the leading cause of violence in today's society.Dogs make better companions than cats.Smoking should be permitted in public places.Females are better students than males.A parent shouldn't pierce a baby's ears.Women should be allowed to go topless in public.Lawyers should make a higher salary than nurses.Everyone should plan their own funeral.Reading English is more difficult than writing English.Summer is the best season of the year.Children under 13 should not be allowed to babysit.High school students should wear uniforms.21 should be the legal driving age around the world.Rock and Roll is the best kind of music.The government should pay for post secondary education.