吃客声声
After more than two decades of headlong rush to transform China from an autarkic centrally planned economy into a limited open-market economy, Hu is now leading a nation in the midst of fateful debates about the most effective and balanced route toward a modern harmonious socialist society. Autarky has never been voluntary Chinese policy under socialism but rather an externally imposed sanction of the Cold War. China's shift toward market economy in the past two and a half decades was not taken in isolation from world trends. When Deng Xiaoping introduced the "open/reform" policies in 1979, toward the end of the Cold War, it was a rational response to a world infatuated with the extravagant promises of neo-liberal free trade. A quarter of a century later, while such open/reform policies have achieved spectacular results in bringing China forward into a modern interdependent world, the glaring resultant imbalances, such as excessive dependence on exports, worsening income disparity, regional development gaps, rampant official corruption, serious environmental crisis and near-total collapse of the social-service network and safety net, are raising calls for rethinking the wisdom of falling for the empty promises of neo-liberal globalization. There is no disagreement among the youth who are destined to shoulder the continuing task of national reconstruction toward economic prosperity and cultural renaissance on the need for further opening/reform. The dispute is on the correct definition and path of opening/reform: open to neo-colonialism and reform toward social inequality and moral decay, or open to assuming a legitimate place as a strong and peaceful nation in a world order of free sovereign nations of equality and reform toward creative and scientific socialist construction based on equality, justice and freedom for all. Over the past 30 years, China has been firmly pressing ahead with the implementation of the reform program and the initiative of opening up to the outside world. With the establishment of a preliminary socialist market economy, and the nation’s economy attaining an outward-oriented perspective, the productive forces and the comprehensive national competence have been on the rising curve constantly. And various social undertakings have been developing in full swing. The living standard of the Chinese people as a whole has undergone a historical leap from a subsistence level to the level of moderate prosperity. In the 30 years between 1978 and 2003, the annual growth rate of China's economy was running at an average of 9.4 percent, with its GDP jumping from 147.3 billion US dollars to over 1.4 trillion US dollars. 30 years ago, China’s foreign trade value and foreign exchange reserves each stood at 20.6 billion and 167 million in US dollars, but last year they shot up to 851.2 billion US dollars and 403.3 billion US dollars respectively. China has now become the sixth largest economy and the fourth largest trader in the world. The tremendous changes in China are attributed to the fact that we have adhered to the path of building socialism with Chinese characteristics and persevered in our reform and opening endeavors, which brought into full play the Chinese people's initiative, enthusiasm and creativeness. Though China has scored impressive achievements in its development, we must not lose sight of our problems: overpopulation, a weak economic foundation, underdeveloped productivity, highly uneven development, and the fairly sharp contradictions between the country's ecological environment and natural resources on the one hand and its economic and social development on the other. China's per capita GDP, though reaching the record high of 1,000 US dollars last year, still ranks well behind the 100th place in the world. To realize China's modernization program and offer all the Chinese people a prosperous life there is yet an uphill battle to fight. We have already set our vision for the first 20 years of this century, which involves the building of a moderately prosperous society of a higher standard in an all-round way for the benefit of well over one billion Chinese people. By 2020 the GDP will be quadrupled from the figure of 2000 to 4 trillion US dollars, with the per capita level averaging at 3,000 US dollars. By then the nation will be immersed in an ambience of greater social harmony with an improved quality of life for the people, featuring a more developed economy, more sound democracy, more thriving culture and more advanced science and education.
虾子王0001
It has been thirty years since China started reform and began a policy of opening up China to the outside world.This has resulted in great changes taking place in various fields. With the nine-year compulsory education(九年制义务教育) program,all children have the chance to be educated.In the past 30 years,China has made great progress in science and technology.In 2003,China launched its first manned spaceship and fulfilled its first space walk in 2008.As economy is developing fast,people's living conditions have greatly improved. In addition,there have also been great changes in sports.The 29th Olympics were successfully hosted in Beijing and Chinese athletes won the most gold medals. I'm really proud of the great achievements in the past 30 years.It is the leadership of the Communist Party and the great efforts of us Chinese people that made all these possible.Nowadays,people are working hard towards a more advanced and harmonious society.I'm sure China will have a brighter future and Chinese people will live a happier life.
春暖花开cai
【Should the University Campus Be Open to Tourists?】【There emerge a popular phenomenon that more and more universities are open to the publc. Different people hold different opinions on this issue. As far as I am concerned, I strongly suggest it should be open to the tourists.】【The reason for this are as follows: First, by touring in a campus tourists have access to some knowlege about the history and students of a university; Second, some elderly people are enabled to recall their past campus time when paying a visit there; It's good for them to have something to nostalgia. Last but not the least, teenagers and kids are likely to have the dream to enter a university after a visit.】【To sum up. leaving tourists an oppourtunity to enjoy themselves in campus brings more good than harm. Therefore, tourists are allowed to enter a university as long as they have civilized behaviours.】 已为你写好,请查收,满意敬请采纳,O(∩_∩)O谢谢~~
ChenYeZhang
Should the University Campus Be Open to Tourists? 如果是按照应该对公众开放的话观点如下。
I think the campus should be open to the outside world. The environment of the university campus is good, and there are many facilities for the masses to play. University campus is not only for students, but also for the masses.
If we are worried about safety, we can increase security forces to check the tourists entering the campus. However, the campus is not open every day. We can set up campus open days at regular intervals to give tourists in need to visit the campus.
So I think the campus should be open to the outside world.
我认为校园是应该对外开放的,大学校园的环境是不错的,也有很多设施是可以供群众游玩的。大学校园不单单是面向学生的,更应该是面向群众的。
如果是担心安全问题的话,我们可以增加安保力量去核查进入校园的游客。但是校园也不是每天都开放的,可以每隔一段时间设立校园开放日,给到需要的游客进校园游览。所以我认为校园是应该对外开放的。
冷扇画屏
During the May Day Holiday, National Day Holiday, summer and winter vacations, many University campuses become popular tourist sites. In my opinion, university campus should be open to tourists. In fact, there are many royal gardens and parks, all of them obviously better than the scenery in the Universities. Why do you think people prefer visiting here with their children? That is because it is a dream goal for many Chinese parents and young ambitious students. Besides this, as more tourists come to visit universities, these universities can widen their influence as well and they can also make some profit from the tourism. In a word, I think the university compus should be open to the tourists.中文翻译;五一假期期间,国庆假期,夏季和冬季度假,许多大学校园成为最受欢迎的旅游景点。在我看来,大学校园应向游人开放。事实上,有很多皇家花园和公园,他们所有人都明显优于大学上的景物。你认为人们为什么喜欢访问这里的带着他们的孩子吗?那是因为它是一个梦想的目标为许多中国父母和年轻有抱负的学生。除此之外,随着更多的游客来此参观大学,这些大学能扩大他们的影响,而且还能让某种利益,而违背初衷,旅游业的发展。总之,我认为大学校园应向游客开放。