• 回答数

    4

  • 浏览数

    128

二的一米
首页 > 英语培训 > 2013考研英语text4

4个回答 默认排序
  • 默认排序
  • 按时间排序

冰峰之晶

已采纳

2013年英语一阅读text4确实是非常难了。

每年考试过后8月份或9月份公布成绩并颁发成绩单,根据教育部规定四六级考试不设置及格线,四级425分(含425分)以上可以报考六级,所以大家普遍认为四六级的合格线为425分。

英语四六级的分数是排位分,没有总分。报名时间CET全国英语四六级考试的考试时间为:每年6月份、12月份(每年时间略有不同)。

2019年1月15日,中国教育部考试中心与英国文化教育协会在京联合发布雅思、普思考试与中国英语能力等级量表对接研究结果。雅思听力得5分,即达到中国英语能力等级量表四级水平。

2013考研英语text4

200 评论(15)

优尼makeup

这里的left应该是leave的过去分词,until now只是插进来的,left to才是应该连在一起的,left to odd, low-level IT staff to put right, 所以这里的left to你应该知道是什么意思了。这里的seen也是see的过去分词,而see是看的意思,所以根据文中意思,这里翻译成"被关注"比较贴切,所以这里断句应该是seen/as a concern/only of data-rich industries/such as banking.所以整个句子的意思大概是:以前这些信息的保密工作一直都是留给(注意:这里的"留给"就是left to)一些没什么水准的员工去处理,而且只被一些涉及大量数据的行业,像银行啊电信啊航空行业这些所关注(它的保密工作←这是我自己加的,便于你理解)。

112 评论(11)

猜我猜不猜

刚做完,难……平时一共错5个的水平,这篇错三个

174 评论(12)

john123kong

Text 4On a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona's immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Aministration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the federal government and the states.An arizona.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona's controversial plan to have state and local police enfour federal immigrations law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Anturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state police that ran to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun .On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately "occupied the field " and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal's privileged powersHowever,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama tures on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”. The White House argued tha Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn't want to carry out Congress's immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.36. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they[A] deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.[B] disturbed the power balance between different states.[C] overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.[D] contradicted both the federal and state policies.37. On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?[A] Federal officers’ duty to withhold immigrants’information.[B] States’ independence from federal immigration law.[C] States’ legitimate role in immigration enforcement.[D] Congress’s intervention in immigration enforcement.38. It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition Acts[A] violated the Constitution.[B] undermined the states’ interests.[C] supported the federal statute.[D] stood in favor of the states.39. The White House claims that its power of enforcement[A] outweighs that held by the states.[B] is dependent on the states’ support.[C] is established by federal statutes.[D] rarely goes against state laws.40. What can be learned from the last paragraph?[A] Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.[B] Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.[C] Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.[D] The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.

332 评论(11)

相关问答