词汇学英文翻译

n.并列；并置；搭配

Vocabulary is an independent discipline, because it has special research objects, word. Phonetics is the only research speech, semantics, but only semantic study of speech and semantic words not simple addition, it is the unity of sounds and meanings. The study of the voice of the isolated words meaning and cannot solve the problem, cannot replace lexicology essence, can cancel lexicology independence. Grammar is starting with words, phrases, sentences of the research into learning, and it cannot replace lexicology.The important because of its lexicology research object. Words are the most valuable wealth. Word through life, every moment. The word of all aspects of life. Words are the elements of human knowledge. Words are many subjects ~ philosophy, psychology, logic, history and anthropology, ethnology, says bioethicist, aesthetics, literature and art, sociological point of concern. But only lexicology attention is word itself.The object of study, lexicology, western scholars said: lexicology sometimes used to a vocabulary to the overall research (including its history), The psychological meaning of linguistics (such as space relation of language expression) called mental lexical. Lexical differences in learning, the latter is the dictionary compiling dictionaries of science and art. Dictionary so can be regarded as "application" is a branch of vocabulary. "Home" this name lexicology, not too common vocabulary for people who are interested in general also called semantics.

"English vocabulary learning course" by the Modern Language Theory as the guide to English vocabulary for the study. The main contents of the structure of words, word formation, word meaning and significance of the relationship between the English vocabulary of composition, meaning the history of the evolution of idiom dictionary and knowledge. The present course will enable learners to master systematically English vocabulary knowledge, more in-depth understanding of the English vocabulary and its historical evolution and modern English vocabulary and the development trend of the phenomenon to analyze and interpret and improve the use of English. This course is based on the English majors of higher learning English vocabulary and school curricula of higher education self-study examination of professional English learning English vocabulary test plans prepared on the basis of that can be used for English majors of higher learning English vocabulary of materials science and higher education self-study examination of materials For the majority of English teachers and English learners, is also a useful reference materials.

Beijing University's Xu Tongqiang has in his monumental work On Language (North East Normal University Publishing House (1997)) strongly advocated replacing "word" in favor of "character" . So, should we as a matter of course speak of "【自己编的词： character-vocabulary and characterology 】"? Xu Tongqiang advocates freeing ourselves from the restrictions of the "Indo-European view" and emphasizes that we should return to the standpoint of the Chinese language: "To observe the structure of the Chinese language through the eyes of the Chinese language." It advocates replacing "words" by "characters". Its definition of a character is: "the smallest morphological unit of a language".Many of Xu Tongqiang's views are very inspiring, and we thoroughly appreciate them. Especially his theory of the "self forming nature" of language is basically the same as the argument of the "self-regulatory function of language" which we uphold. "Self forming nature" means "self-regulatory function". But when it comes to replacing "words" with "characters", we can't subscribe to his views, which are hard to comprehend. I 【应该是 we 吧】can not understand why he holds these views. We keep using the terms "word, vocabulary, lexicography" and we don't support the "character, character-vocabulary, characterology" stand. We hold that there should be a clear distinction between "word" and "character" , a distinction between language and characters. Very rarely do scholars In the lexicology world support Xu Tongqiang. The reason for that is simple: if there were to be no "words", where would that leave the discipline that examines words -- lexicology? What would there be left for "【自己编的词: word-scholars, i.e. lexicologists 】" to to study? Now that Xu Tongqiang's views are accepted by hardly anyone in the lexicology world, there is no need for us to say much more about it.

词的搭配、排列