盖然性，，英语

もしも:假使,万一もし:要,要是,如果,假如,假设,倘若------------------------------------------------------------------------------------もし和もしも基本上意思相似。而且,在句子上用的区别也不是很大。但是,もしも比もし,假设盖然性要小,这是最大的区别。日语的解释,也一起参考一下。1．「もしも」も「もし」も同じ仮定の接続词ですね。英语では" If "ですよね。「もしも」は盖然性が非常に低い（少ない）言い方ですね。空想や御伽噺（おとぎばなし）の世界みたいに。无论、「もしも」もそういう场合にも使いますが、盖然性がある场合には、「もしも」は不适当な场合が多いのです。ことば、そして日本语って暧昧さがいつも长い尻尾のようにくっついていますね。2.莲の叶は一枚、二枚ですね。お皿と同じです。3.「もしも私が一枚の莲の叶だったら」＝决してそううことではないことを、仮定にして语っています。「もしも私が一枚の莲の叶（⇒女）であれば」とおきかえて、＝今の女性の生きかたや考えは、克服したいと思うものだ。というようにないことであっても、ありうる立场変换を表现できます。「もしも私が一枚の莲の叶なら」＝後には鲋や泥鰌が触るから、くすぐったいよとか続くのでしょうが、「もしも私が一枚の莲の叶（⇒女）であれば」と同じ表现とすることができます。この使用の区别は、文章のリズムやその人の好みとくせなどでしょうね。外国语は难しいですね。日本语の上手な中国の知人たちも、ご苦労されています。いえちょいと违和感があっても気付きません。それはしょうがない、日本人同士でも方言っていうのや、各人のくせがありますから。请参考。

你的看法 有道理应该 用 will expandwlii 用于主语第二人称 或第三人称 表示无意识的行为意思是 将、会、便 表示 必然性、盖然性如 if today is monday,tomorrow will be tuesday.你的句子 that引导的是主语从句 a balloon will expand 是主语从句中的主句when引导的是主语从句中的 状语从句应该主将从先 不过 用一般现在时 也是对的。

不对，不能加will，后面是when引导的时间状语从句，前面主句就一般时态

Labor dispute is to show unit of choose and employ persons and laborer, based on labor contract and related laws and regulations or unit of choose and employ persons labor system formed labor contract relationship or factual labor to concern and controversy of rights and obligations.Labor disputes in the dispute settlement mechanism, inevitably involve the burden of proof. Current laws will labor dispute into the civil procedure law, the scope of labor relations besides general civil legal relationship of equality, also has its unique membership, RenShenXing etc. In labor relations, unit of choose and employ persons, laborer is one side were managers, between the managers are not equal status in the burden on the ability, also have obvious difference. But for the allocation of the burden of labor dispute is stipulated, the problem of the concrete practice against. In the labor dispute arbitration or litigation of burden for more detailed division, with scientific proof responsibility theory in perfect, better fairness, solving labor disputes.This paper tries to discuss the labor relations, namely the adjustment by law shall, labor relations, is a kind of special labor relations. Labor relations with the will of the state and the main properties and will concurrently, equality and personal relationship and property relationship with nature. According to different classification method, the labor dispute is divided into the individual and the collective controversy, group dispute; Rights and interests and confirmation of disputes, payment of controversy and alteration of controversy, Confirmation of dispute, payment of disputes, the change of dispute.In case the authorities are faced with the burden of proof allocation problem. The problems in the distribution of the burden of proof, different theories. There is a legal requirement is representative of the classification, probability, the danger field. In civil lawsuit legal requirement basically adopts the theory of distribution classified said proof responsibility. And according to the provisions of labor dispute proof responsibility, referring to the labor dispute mediation and arbitration law, regulations and judicial interpretations evidence and the administrative regulations, the provisions of the way is clear evidence rules and regulations of the article 6 of the labor dispute, but the burden of proof is too general and narrow. Overall, about labor dispute, below the proof system：（1）A labor dispute case of lack of clear proof responsibility theory guidance（2）The judicial interpretation of labor dispute lawsuit which determine the distribution of proof responsibility too narrow range（3）The judicial interpretation of the allocation of the burden that does not conform to the legal requirements classification said（4）Evidence rules of labor dispute the burden distribution does not conform to the provisions of the burdenOn the distribution of labor dispute, the burden of proof for different scholars. Some scholars think, according to labor dispute 7 disputes, pay disputes, management and labor contract dispute distribution proof responsibility, Some scholars think in labor law relations between the essence of unequal status, in order to effectively protect worker, should execute completely burden.The author argues that the labor dispute, the distribution of proof of labor law, according to labor law entity proved the allocation of responsibility. At the same time, the burden of proof for the distribution of labor dispute, must consider our about the inherent theoretical proof responsibility allotment, it has now been gradually mature proof responsibility distribution theory blind pursue path. In labor disputes in the allocation of the burden of proof, the following aspects should be taken into consideration:1.With a legal requirement for the classification of the burden of proof that fundamental principle of distribution2.On the basis of equal to protect the lawful rights and interests of the parties3.In the legislation should be fully clear proof of labor dispute the allocation of responsibility principle and systemFor labor dispute the burden of proof, the distribution of specific rules of civil procedure to borrow in lawsuit classification theories of labor dispute, the types and the civil lawsuit classification theories of combination of labor dispute into confirmation (of), to FuXing labor dispute (payment) and change the defense of the labor dispute (the), the burden of proof.On the burden of proof for distribution of labor dispute, laborer still exists weak evidence. Unit of choose and employ persons in the arbitration and litigation are likely to mastering the evidence material intentionally don't provide, or to laborer of facts says "don't know," "don't remember," or unit of choose and employ persons that all the above statements do disadvantage. This has caused the evidence difficult. Workers party The author thinks that the correct application, constructive system can help in this situation.以上为 有道桌面词典 翻译结果，仅供参考。