毕筱倩mm
A company or an organization need a superintendent, but under him must have many department superintendents. Each person's thought is different, manages the style is different. Also the management was a very abstract thing, did not look like that simply, many matters which in the book said you must because of the human decide, but must change according to the time evolution. Therefore, manages the style I not to think well. US University of Iowa's Kurt Lewin namely representative who discusses for the management style. He divided into 1939 the leader according to the use authority's way three kinds: autocratic, democratic or participative, laissez-faire, free-rein. Even so the simple classification, each kind still had many substantive differences. For example, some dictators are deeply loved by the subordinate the esteem, cares about the folk vigorous pain very much. Similarly, not only also has the participation-like leadership to listen attentively to the subordinate opinion, but also exhausts ability provides the essential support, lets the subordinate complete the task. In 1958, his nai class and Schmitt (R.Tanenbaum & W.H. Schmidt) advances one kind of continuous theory. Will lead the way to participate in policy-making according to the subordinate the degree classifying, divides into four kinds approximately: autocratic decision, joint decision, delegation, consultation. Certainly, not only between the leader and the subordinate the influence proportion the discrimination is four kinds, if cuts thin to turn a series of continuous again each kind of degree leadership style. In the entire decision-making has a part is leader's influence (A), another part is by leader's influence (B). If A is smaller than B, expresses for take the subordinate as the central leadership pattern; If A is bigger than B, expresses take the boss as the central leadership pattern. A=0 is governs by non-interference, B=0 is the dictatorship. If looked from the entire decision-making, then must satisfy A+B=1 A, the B combination to have infinite many kinds. The infinite multi-combinations constitute a series of continuous each kind of degree leadership style. thus it can be seen manages the style not well. Each person's ability is different he the mode of administration is also different, what even if everybody studies is the homogeneous mode of administration, but each leader's charm is different, he leads the team produces the effect is also different. A simple example, has ability to have the charm very much to be deep very much the staff deep affection leadership to manage his team, always uses the similar management style one ability charm leadership effect not to be better. What this is really decides because of the human, therefore I think really not a most management style also.
