法律英语翻译素材

1. To establish an effective contract, the parties must be consensual, and the agreement is adopted by the party to put forward an offer that the other party to accept an offer to be embodied in 2. If the commitment to the force of law to become an exchange, it is necessary to carry out 3. Must have a valid contract for the parties to support the price.'s Definition of price is reached through bargaining and exchange. In other words, those who accept the commitment to give up something or suffer damage to the contract in exchange for promises 4. Revocable contracts can mean the cancellation of the contract, that is to say, even if the contract by the agreement constitutes a clear and there is value and purpose of the law, a party can legally withdraw 5. Contract can be considered as null and void a number of reasons, such as illegal, not price, or one or both parties do not ability. In some cases, out of public order and good customs of the reasons, the court will determine a legal contract null and void 6. Intentional tort some of the accused can show that the infringement is allowed to raise legal defense 7. Fraud as a violation of a defense 8. Tort law is what the violations, and that can be socially acceptable and responsible standards of conduct 9. Contract is an agreement of both parties, a party that is in violation of the agreement constitute a breach of contract 10. Waiver of individual freedom does not constitute unlawful detention

1. being probable to establish a valid contract, the litigant must have meet one's satisfaction, but meets one's satisfaction is also proposes the important contract through a side, another side accepts 2. pledge which the important contract manifests, if becomes the legally binding one kind of exchange, must fulfill 3. valid contract to have the value support all quarters litigant's request. The value definition is the exchange which achieves after the negotiated price. That is, accepts the pledge the human must give up certain things or the withstanding harm, the contract which receives in exchange for the contract the pledge 4. to be possible to abolish the contract which is refers to may cancel, i.e., even if the contract by the explicit agreement constitution, and has the value and the legal goal, a side may also abolish 5. contract in the law to be possible, because many kinds of reasons are considered invalid, if illegal, does not have the value, either a side or both sides do not have the treaty-making power. Sometimes, stemming from the male foreword good vulgar reason, the court also will determine a legitimate contract invalid 6. some intentional tort to be possible through to indicate that defendant's abuse of authority will be the legitimate permission proposed contradicted 7. cheating to be possible to contradict 8. right infringement law as violation behavior to stipulate anything violates the behavior, and had stipulated may, the responsible behavior standard 9. contract which accepted for the society is the litigant both sides agreement, a side violated the agreement is the constitution breaks a contract 10. to give up the individual freedom not constituting the illegal detention automatically

If approved by both parties demonstrate the technical supervision departments identified, because the quality of supply of goods own defects, loss or claim arising, the supplier shall be held accountable under the law. .Suppliers have the responsibility of the buyer of the set and confirmed in writing by the supplier of the business requirements and specifications.The two sides agreed that the disputes arising from this agreement by the defendant, the jurisdiction of local people's court.Agreed by the supplier.朗读显示对应的拉丁字符的拼音字典 - 查看字典详细内容翻译以下任意网站Tom.com-中国El Confidencial-西班牙Louvre-法国Spiegel Online-德国Venezuela Tuya-西班牙语BBC News-英国Philadelphia Inquirer-美国Vogue-法国Telegraph.co.uk-英国Komika Magasin-瑞典语Berlingske.dk-丹麦Yomuiri Online-日本

.杜威肯把实证主义在确认其他标准是否可以定义为法律上的无能视为一个弱点.他认为这一弱点最终将把它们错误的引入没有任何一种特殊法律适用于此种特殊案件的境地,这就是所谓的难处理的案件.因此,为了作出结论,就要依赖审判人员自由酌情处理.在这方面,杜威肯针对哈特持有的法律为法规体系的观点提出了明确的批评根据哈特的理论,只有那些正式生效的法律体系的法规列出的,能够满足法律上的有效性这一标准的法规才可以被定义为法律,其他.例如道德准则,社会标准均不能被定义为法律,因此也不可以直接适用于法庭审判过程.一般来说,法官在确定法律制度是否适用于某一特殊争端和用法律制度去解决这一争端上是没有问题的

德沃金认为，不能实证主义承认任何其他标准，作为法律的一个弱点，最终导致他们错误地建议，在一些情况下还没有具体的法律适用于某一特定情况---所谓的“疑难案件” -当时的法官有可能利用其自由裁量权，以reache决定。在这方面，德沃金特别批评哈特的概念，法律制度的规则。 据哈特的计划，只有那些符合规则的法律效力的标准中规定的法律制度的规则，识别可能被归类为法律。其他事物，包括议事规则和其他社会道德标准，不能将为此法律和不直接相关的过程中所进行的审判法庭。通常情况下，法官将不会有任何问题，确定的法律规则，适用于某一纠纷并利用它们来解决争端。