法律英语在线词典

我知道你的想法，我很赞成你的

Labor dispute in arbitration or litigation the burden of proof for a more detailed and scientific division has proved beneficial to duty in the theory of sound at the same time, better fair and just settlement of labor disputes. In this paper to discuss labor relations, labor law that is subject to adjust labor relations, should be a specific, narrow sense of labor relations. Labor relations with the country led by the will of the parties as the main body of the will of property, both equal and subordinate to, and both personal relationships and the nature of property relations.Labor dispute means between employers and employees, based on labor contracts, employment-related laws and regulations or the formation of unit labor system of labor contracts or labor relations and the fact that the rights and obligations of the dispute happened. Labor dispute at the dispute settlement mechanism, will inevitably involve the question of burden of proof.China's existing laws will be incorporated into the labor dispute the scope of application of the Code of Civil Procedure, and labor relations in addition to a general civil law relations with equality, but also with its unique membership, and personal characteristics, etc.. In labor relations, the employer is a party managers, party workers were managers, the status between the two is unequal in ability on the burden of proof also has significant differences. In China, labor disputes on the allocation of the burden of proof provisions of a more general problem, the practice is not conducive to the specific operation.This resulted in the burden of difficult side of workers. The author believes that right is presumed to apply the system, can help to improve this situation.I believe that the labor dispute on the allocation of burden of proof, it can not be separated from the substantive law of labor to carry out research, working entities in accordance with laws and regulations to carry out the distribution of burden of proof. At the same time, labor disputes for the distribution of burden of proof, we must consider the distribution of our country about the inherent burden of proof theory, can not be completely mature now set aside the duty to prove the theory of blind pursuit of alternative distribution. Labor dispute in the distribution of the burden of proof should be focused on several aspects to consider are as follows: 1.Classification of legal requirements to prove that for the distribution of the basic principles of duty 2. Adhere to the equal protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties in principle 3.The burden of proof for the labor dispute provisions scattered "Labor Dispute Mediation Arbitration Law," "evidence," which, as well as administrative regulations, judicial interpretations, the most clearly defined than the "rules of evidence" in Article VI, the provisions of the six working duty to prove controversial, but the provisions are too broad and narrow.According to different classifications of labor disputes has been divided into individual disputes, collective disputes and controversial groups; the rights and interests of controversial disputes, confirm-type controversy, debate and change the payment type of controversy; confirmed type controversy, dispute payments, change-type controversy. Authorities appear in both cases are faced with the question of how to allocate the burden of proof. Distribution in the burden of proof on the question, have a different theory. There is a more representative classification of legal requirements that the probability that the area of said dangerous. Our country in civil law to take up the main elements of the theory of classification of distribution, said the burden of proof.

The network information technically flies to soon develop and extensively applied, also brought a new challenge for people's protection of the right of privacy at the time of bringing people the convenient and fast life style and huge business benefits.Practice medium on-line infringement affairs, particularly the affairs multifarious occurrence which violates network right of privacy, make the lawmaking protection of network right of privacy become theories and practice a medium hot point problem.The international communities all are aware of urgency to carry on the law protection to network right of privacy nowadays, but the our country law definitely didn't rule right of privacy currently.The provision just passed reputation power as to it's carry on a protection, belong to lawmaking blank more to the protection of network right of privacy.Therefore should try to draw lessons from abroad of related protection mode, combine our country state of the nation, take lawmaking rules and regulations as predominance, assist it take charge of by profession self-discipline, technique protection and government, set up citizen to protect personal consciousness of privacy in the meantime, with realization to network right of privacy of valid protect.This text takes the United States and EU as the representative's two greatest lawmakings mode through a research and currently our country's lawmaking condition in network right of privacy, put forward some counterplans and suggestion towards set up our country network right of privacy lawmaking protect system.Promote thus our country to the mechanism that the law of network right of privacy protect of perfect, attain full protection network right of privacy of purpose.基本上是对的，累死我了，我可没用机译哦，是我自己翻译的，要选我的哦

Law and human struggle all the judges, hello: I'd like to tell you a I have ever heard of a true story: a couple emotional discord, the husband to his wife often a domestic violence. His wife to her daughter's study and life, always submit to humiliation. And in the face of the frequent family violence, the wife can't stand the husband to one's own soul and body wounds, so their brutally killed her husband. The case was caused many people's attention, and how to the wife sentence, people have a fierce debate. The court sentenced to the wife for death sentence with a reprieve. And the case, it shows us the law and human feelings of intense conflicts. The law and the conflict and has a long history, in today's high-speed development of Chinese society, the problem is particularly prominent. According to the relevant departments to reflect, the court judge in the process, often meet with similar cases. And in the face of such troublesome case, test more is the wisdom of the judge. This conflict appears the reason is various, but mainly has two aspects: on the one hand, because of China's law for the lack of Chinese traditional ethical values of the considerations, more is introduce foreign legal culture. The public laws lack of understanding and support, legal consciousness. On the other hand is, people could not really in law and human find a balance between them. Legal reasons people emotion at the same time, also cannot make emotional about law. In order to better will laws and customs combined, I think we can from the following two aspects: first, the establishment of the jury system. China's judicial trial has closed, the establishment of jury system, can make the judicial trial at the trial is combined with public opinion, combined with the public ethical values, thus reduce the pressure of public opinion. Second, to establish judicial authority justice image, extensive and lasting law propaganda activities. Let the public know the law, CARES about judicial judgment. So as to reduce the public the misunderstanding of the judicial, reduce the jealousy and suspicion. From the two aspects, I want to solve the problem of law and human feelings between debate, can help. As a law student, I advocate law, but I also for national conditions. I want to say, they both is equal, have the same important position. Face justice, we should not for external things interference, a fair trial. Facing the public, we must consider the public will, but not flirting. For maintaining social justice, is our mission.