• 回答数

    3

  • 浏览数

    310

默然回首千百度
首页 > 英语培训 > 谁主张谁举证英文

3个回答 默认排序
  • 默认排序
  • 按时间排序

zhangzhangdd

已采纳

In modern litigation, the burden of proof problem is the core problem, if the evidence of the lack of or incomplete, there is no case to identify, to clarify the causal relationship disputes happen, the dispute can not be the right solution. The burden of proof to determine the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant at the time of the prosecution and defense need to advocate what the Elements of the facts, as well as in fact happened is disputed, by the burden of proof to prove which side first. How to allocate the burden of proof the parties directly related to the results of a magistrate judge. This paper attempts to parties in civil proceedings the burden of proof of concept, the distribution of the burden of proof of the general rule - who advocate who rules of evidence, burden of proof rules, remove the burden of proof in the subject-matter areas such as research, with a view to the right of judges to act in accordance with the rules of evidence in order to avoid to misjudge the phenomenon. This paper sets out the concept of burden of proof, as well as in actual cases how to allocate the burden of proof, in exceptional cases, the burden of proof in the general provisions.希望对你有帮助。

谁主张谁举证英文

287 评论(11)

快乐@天使33

在中国,虽然大多数的法律都主张的是“谁主张谁举证”,但是在《中华人民共和国证券法》第六十九条的规定,上市公司的董事、监事、高级管理人员和其他责任人员以及保荐人、承销的证券公司,他们是举证责任倒置,只有在证明自己无过错是,才能不承担连带赔偿责任。对于美国的证券规定,可以参照张路编写的《美国1933年证券法》第64页,我英文不好,不能给你更多的帮助了……

346 评论(10)

痴货哟i

美国和中国的法律区别很大,但是不能笼统地说美国是英美法系(也叫普通法系、判例法系等),中国属于大陆法系(也叫成文法系等),因为说美国属于英美法系可以说是公认的,但是说中国是大陆法系国家则有失公允,尤其是我国的法律制度是属于有中国特色的社会主义法律体系,是自成一家的,不能简单地划入某个法系。比如说我国的合同法在合同的订立程序上就是采用英美法系的制度,但是在判断合同的成立上却又有些许不同,在要约和承诺的具体规定上也有自己的特色,而且没有对价制度的构建等。具体的说,美国和中国在具体的法律体系、法律制度、法学教育和司法体制上都是有区别的。 举证之类的东西,英文也叫burden of proof,就是举证负担,也就是举证责任的承担,就是列举本方证据证明自己的观点或主张是正确的,按照我们民诉法的规定,一般情况下是“谁主张,谁举证”,就是你要主张什么,就需要证明什么,同时在某些案件中会有举证责任倒置,就是让被告举证自己没有过错的情形,尤其是推定过错责任制下更是如此。 三方举证,按照字面理解不像是第三方举证,请您再次核对一下,是否确实是三方举证。

228 评论(15)

相关问答