guodong930
在现实生活或工作学习中，大家都不可避免地要接触到作文吧，作文是由文字组成，经过人的思想考虑，通过语言组织来表达一个主题意义的文体。你知道作文怎样才能写的好吗？以下是我为大家整理的高考改革的好与坏大学英语作文带翻译，仅供参考，希望能够帮助到大家。 In 20xx, it has been said that the College Entrance Exam will be reformed by Education Ministry, people have waited for the outcome these days, it is a great thing for the students, because it will decide their future. Now, the reform has come out, in the future, there will be no separation between liberal art and science, this decision has good side and bad side. 在20xx年，据了解，高考将会受到教育部的改革，这些日子以来，人们都在等待结果，这对学生来说是件大事，因为那将会决定他们的.将来。如今，改革方案已经出来了，将来，文科和理科不分家，这样的决定有好也有不好。 On the one hand, it can improve students’ overall education. Since there will be no separation between liberal art and science, students need to pay attention to overall education, they must learn all the subjects. The overall education is popular in western education, the students take part in activity, making themselves learn more skills. I believe our education can catch up with western education. 一方面，改革能提高学生的全面教育。由于文科和理科不分家，学生需要把精力放在全面教育，他们必须学习所有的科目。全面教育在西方国家很流行，学生参加活动，让他们自己学到更多的技能。我相信我们的教育会赶上西方国家的教育。 On the other hand, everyone has their talent in some subjects, it is hard for student to learn all the subjects. For most girls, they are good at liberal art, while for boys, most of them are interested in science. If they have to learn all the subjects, they can’t focus their attention on their advantaged subjects. 另一方面，每个人在一些科目都有他们的天分，对学生来说，很难去学习所有的科目。对于大部分女孩子来说，他们擅长文科，然而对于男孩子来说，他们中的大部分人都对理科感兴 趣。如果他们学习所有的科目，他们无法集中精力在他们的优势科目上。 In all, it needs time for students to get used to the reform, I believe it will do good to students’ future development. 总的来说，学生需要时间来适应改革，我相信改革会对学生的长远发展有利。
Lucia慢半拍
When it comes to the college entrance examination, people usually have a saying, " after all is fair ". I think not, and said, this is truly a doublespeak. College entrance examination has never justice; justice and happiness, never absolute.From an examination of the identified, could be clearly seen, its purpose is to choose some people, instead of giving all give the so-called fair, objective has already established its injustice, not because it means is disclosed that it is fair, there is no test high school graduates are not eligible for social education resources? For various reasons, failed after suffering the students, their pain is deserved? Besides, originally around the education level is not the same, and the college entrance examination because of each district enrollment allocation number is over, obtain fractional line is not the same, is this fair?But today we come to see, we can not because of starving when getting a steamed bread of happiness, and thought the steamed bread is always our happiness. Just, fair is always relative, happiness is relative, we should review and revise for many years as a "good thing " behind the defect.说到高考，人们通常都有一种说法，说“毕竟是公正的”。回头我想想，跟不上说，这实在是一个欺人之谈。高考从来也没有公正过；公正和幸福一样，从来也没有绝对的。从一个考试的确定，可以清清楚楚地看到，它的目的是为了选择一些人，而不是给所有的全体给予所谓的公正，目的已经确定了它的不公正，不因为它选择所采取的手段是公开的就说它是公正的，难道那些没有考上的高中毕业生就没有资格获得社会的高等教育的资源了吗？因为各种各样的原因，落榜后痛苦的学生们，他们的痛苦是应得的吗？再说，本来各地的教育水平就不一样，而高考因为各地招生人数的人为分配数目不一，各地的考取分数线又不一样，这难道是公平的吗？但今天我们来看，我们不能因为快饿死的时候获得一个馒头的幸福，而以为这个馒头永远是我们的幸福。公正、公平永远是相对的，幸福也是相对的，我们早应该检讨并且修正持续多年的一件“好事情”背后的缺陷了。
