• 回答数

    5

  • 浏览数

    98

缘梦~幸福宝贝
首页 > 英语培训 > 英语辩论模板

5个回答 默认排序
  • 默认排序
  • 按时间排序

我爱吃土豆儿

已采纳

As is known to all, it is important to be/ do… I think there are at least two reasons for… For one thing,… For another,…. Let’s take… for example… From what I have mentioned above we can see that without… we can not … it is clear that…. play an important part in…Different people, however, have different opinions on this matters. Some people think that … According to them all of us should… Others argue that … in their point of view, nobody can without … Compared with…, has a lot of advantages over… There is no doubt that … As a consequence, …. In short, I firmly support the view that … It is because… So my conclusion is that ….(109words)1. 对立观点式: A.有人认为X 是好事,赞成X, 为什么? B.有人认为X 是坏事, 反对X,为什么? C.我的看法。 Some people are in favor of the idea of doing X. They point out the fact that 支持X 的第一个原因。They also argue that 支持X 的另一个原因。 However, other people stand on a different ground. They consider it harmful to do X. They firmly point out that 反对X 的第一个理由。An example can give the details of this argument: 一个例子。 There is some truth in both arguments. But I think the advantages of X overweigh the disadvantages. In addition to the above-mentioned negative effects it might bring about, X also may X 的一个坏处。 2. 批驳观点式: A.一个错误观点。 B.我不同意。 Many people argue that 错误观点。By saying that, they mean 对这个观点的进一步解释。An example they have presented is that 一个例子。(According to a survey performed by X on a group of Y, almost 80% of them 赞成这个错误观点或者受到这个错误观点的影响)。 There might be some element of truth in these people's belief. But if we consider it in depth, we will feel no reservation to conclude that 与错误观点相反的观点。There are a number of reasons behind my belief.(以下参照辩论文的议论文写法)。 3. 社会问题(现象)式 A.一个社会问题或者现象。 B.产生的原因 C.对社会和我们生活的影响 D. 如何杜绝。(如果是问题的话) E. 前景的预测。 Nowadays, there exists an increasingly serious social/economic/environmental problem. (X has increasingly become a common concern of the public). According to a survey, 调查内容说明这种现象的情况。(或者是一个例子) There are a couple of reasons booming this problem/phenomenon. 下面参照辩论式议论文的写法。 X has caused substantial impact on the society and our daily life, which has been articulated in the following aspects. 参照辩论式议论文的写法。 A dozen of measures are supposed to take to prevent X from bringing us more harm. 参照辩论式议论文的写法。 Based on the above discussions, I can easily forecast that more and more people will... 议论文有三要点:论点、论据、论证方法。论点:作者对某事某现象持有的见解或主张。论据:1.事实论据 2.理论论据 用来证明论点的理由或根据。论证方法:对比 归纳 演绎等......

英语辩论模板

234 评论(12)

三石太保

1、正方: The claim

反方:The counterclaim

2、正方: Positive side

反方: Negative side

3、正方 Affirmative side

反方:Negative side

对于辩证,相信大家都挺熟悉的,对于这个词的翻译,有两个不同的解释

(1)表示解释某一个东西

假如只是用于解释某样事物或者理论,其实我们用普通的explain来翻译即可。

(2)辩证法 dialectic

相信大家都学习过辩证法,“辩证法”我们可以翻译为dialectic。算是一个专有名词。类似的“辩证法思维”,我们可以翻译做“dialectical thinking”。

Dialectic studies how opposites can become identical.

辩证法研究对立物是怎样变统一的.

319 评论(9)

甜甜婉儿

Almost everybody assumes that Chinese religion is polytheist in nature. My question is: where did this sort of religion come from? How did it originate? As for the origin of religion in general, there have been two opposite theoretical explanations. The first is a quite prevailing one, as represented by such giant thinkers as Herbert Spencer, Burnet Taylor, George Frazer, etc. According to them, religions have been developed evolutionally in a progressive way, i.e., from the pre-or/and simi-religions in the pre-historical time, to the polytheism in most ancient civilizations, and lastly, to the monotheism only in Judaism, Christianity and Islamism. On the other side, William Schmidt and others represent an opposite theory. They attempted to prove that the developing line of religion is not progressive, but degenerate from a primary monotheism in the process of cultural diffusion to varieties of polytheism, and even lower forms of superstition. A key point of their disagreement concerns the objects of religious worship. According to the progressive theory, the low, manifold and complex worship objects converged upon the simple, unified and higher ones, and finally, upon the ultimate reality pointing to a unique, supreme God. The degenerate theory assumed an opposite direction of divergence, starting with the supreme God and ending with the lowest sort of religions. The debate between the two theories has taken place since the second half of the 19th century. Due to the limit of knowledge and interest, both sides could hardly take account of Chinese religion in the ancient time. Western scholars took it for granted that the Chinese religion is a form of polytheism, and originated from totem worship, animism and magic rituals, as they had seen in other primitive cultures. Since this century many new discoveries and interpretations have been made in the fields of archaeology, anthropology, sociology, history, linguistics and cross-cultural studies. These enable us to rethink the origin and development of the Chinese religion in the context of the unsolved debate between progressive and degenerate theories. The chronology of the Chinese religion can be divided into 3 stages: the primary religion in the pre-historical time, the primary system of polytheism in the Shang and Chou Dynasties, and the proliferated forms of polytheism from Chin Dynasty to the present time. We know little about the primary religion and focus ourselves on the religion in the Shang and Chou Dynasties. According to my analysis, the polytheistic system in that time manifested a hierarchy of objects of worship, from the highest, supreme God, to the ancestral spirits, and then to the natural spirits and the lowest spirits of ordinary life. Based on the exegesis of oracle bone inscriptions in the Shang time and classics in the pre-Chin time, my paper is intended to prove the thesis that it is unlikely that the polytheism in the Shang and Chou time resulted from a converging progress from more primitive and lower worships. That religious system was constructed and functioned downwards from above, rather than upwards from below. I dare to present arguments for the above thesis as follows. I. It is unlikely that the supreme God was produced by Shang people as a result of the convergence from their images of ancestral spirits. 1) The Shang people didn’t have the idea that God had a blood relationship with their ancestors. Their relationship was rather conceived as the host-guest relation. 2) God did not communicate with people directly, but only indirectly through the mediation of their ancestors. 3) God was conceived as the source of life and the originator of mankind, yet without sexual behavior and natural birth. This perplexity led to the myth of the sympathetic birth in almost all ancient societies. 4) God was not produced as a result of the abstraction from the total image of their ancestors. This can be shown by the ritual order, in which the rites for the God was strictly distinguished from, and higher than the rites for the totality of ancestors. II. It is unlikely that the God was produced as a result of a converging development from natural spirits. 1) Natural spirits were the personal images of the minister-ancestors. It is illogical to conceive them as the image of God who is higher than the king-ancestors. 2) The God named as Ti in the Shang time, and was neither the God of heaven, nor a natural God. He was identical with the Heaven (Tian) only later in the Chou time. 3) The shift from Ti to Tian can be explained in terms of moralization from a humanistic perspective, but also in terms of a degeneration of religious faith and feeling from a theological (not necessarily Christian) perspective. The tendency of degeneration continued in and after the pre-Chin time and led to a naturalistic attitude towards Heaven. III. Ancestral spirits were not worshiped as a result of the converging development of animism and totem. 1) Ancestral spirits were dead persons with both spirit and body. Therefore no difference between spirit and ghost existed in that time. Those personal spirits and ghosts are not the same as souls in the animism that Taylor proposed. 2) Ancestral spirits were not developed from totem worship. According to my own interpretation, a totem is a symbol used for the classification of blood ties and the identity of a clan. When the totem symbols were changed into name during the time of the beginning of a primitive language, especially in the process of the origin of the pictorial language of the chinese, the symbolized animals were confused with the first ancestor of the clan. 3) The transformation from totem worship to ancestral worship can be understood better as the mythical origin, caused by a certain “linguistic disease” (in the words of Max Müller). . VI. The divination in the Shang and Chou time cannot be interpreted by Frazer’s theory of magic in terms of shamanism. 1) Divination was used as a necessary means to communicate with the God after a religious reform in the pre-historical time, which broke the Heaven-Earth link. 2) The diviner (wu) is not the same as a magician. The role assigned to the wu was to serve as mediator in communication. He was only able to pass the divine prediction without any power to change it, much less affect or even control God by his magic power. 3) The wu has to show the great piety and respect for the God in order to receive the divine information. Divination was practiced as a part and an effect of the divine worship, and cannot be prior to the notion of an omniscient God.参考资料:

158 评论(14)

半调子810

1、辩论赛:Dabate 2、正方: The claim 反方:The counterclaim 或者 正方: Positive side 反方: Negative side 或者 正方 Affirmative side 反方:Negative side 3、辩手: 一辩:The first speaker 或The first debater 二辩 The second spea

184 评论(12)

langlang0802

坚持自己的观点,不要有对方的观点也没有的想法。沿着自己关点的路线走,不管对方说什么,用你的关点去反驳而不要跟着他的观点走。否则最后自己就无语了。辩论赛只要自己一直有话说,就算是败了也会很有气度。

342 评论(11)

相关问答