明星代言英语广告

the stars should be responsible ,most people buy the product becouse the star is famouse.It's irresponsible if the star don't know about the product he represent but recommend it to the consumers.The Advertising Law in USA formulated that the star must be the user of the product or the advertising will be a false one.Anti-side:they have no responsibility in law ,if the product have some problem, it's the responsibility of the manufacturer and the seller .It's not related to the stars.they have no ability to know if the product is good or bad.The SanLu powdered milk have got the National Quality Inspection ,and is exempted from inspection.A product like is ,how should the stars dicide on if he should represent or not?In my opinion ,wo should be more logos when choosing products.wo shouldn't buy pruducts sightless just becouse it's the product who represented.At the same time ,there should be more close supervision to the quality from the goverment,ang the stars should recommend it to the consumers after they use it,not to represent false ones.

张翰竟然代言过英语机构，他的英语水平非常非常一般。

对于张翰英语不好却能代言英语机构这件事其实我是见怪不怪的，因为只要钱到位就没有请不到的明星。而且很显然当初英语机构选择张翰做代言人是看中了他背后的人气，也不是要他英语好。他们双方都有自己的算盘的。

张翰最近可是风口浪尖上的男人，因为他自己当编剧和制片人的《东八区的先生们》口碑差到不行，而且在剧中他非常油腻，以及整部剧给人的价值观有问题，他变成了人人喊打的“油王”。也因为这个原因，网友们纷纷找出他的黑历史（油腻发言等）。这让大家重新认识了他一下。

至于我为啥会说张翰英语很普通很一般，是因为在网友翻出来的旧料里面有一个视频恰好是他说英语的。怎么说呢！就是小学生式英语，一个单词一个单词往外蹦，至于发音也就那样，反正算不上好。

个人感觉很多时候明星代言的广告真的不能信的，因为明星只是拿钱拍摄根本不管质量的。而厂家也是只冲着他的影响力去的，反正没有一方是真的有关注到我们消费者。就拿张翰代言英语机构来说，如果机构真的是看中英语水平能力找的代言，那么就绝对不是张翰。而张翰如果不是为钱代言，也绝对不会心安理得地代言英语机构，因为他本身的实力够不上。

最后，张翰英语水平一般却可以代言英语机构这个事情可以看到很多广告营销存在不真实性，不要轻信广告。同样很多的明星广告都可能存在相同的问题，大家如果要选择其代言产品最好不要盲目先考察一下。不然最终损失的是我们自己！

一般,没南航机长广播说的好,这个张翰真的是太逊了

看看我的行不行啊Zhengfang: Star should be responsible, because a lot of people loved star, because his popularity will go to buy merchandise purchase, if they do not know their own endorsement of the merchandise and irresponsible to recommend the vast number of consumers are very irresponsible act! Advertisement Law of the United States states: "The star must be the real users of products, or there is false advertisement Anti-side: they do not have the legal responsibility of a Product problem, should be the production and sale of the operator's responsibility, nothing to do with the star. Stars simply do not have the ability to distinguish good and bad products, Sanlu milk powder, "both of the National Quality Inspection report qualified, and are exempt National Product, such Product, star in deciding whether to speak when there will be doubts how? I feel that our product selection at reasonable consumption should and should not be a star endorsement because blindly buy, at the same time the Government should take the step up supervision of the quality of the enterprises have a very good monitor, and Star Products should also be used in order to recommend consumers should not be irresponsible to advocate false advertisement

英语水平特别抠脚，根本就不会说出专业的单词，甚至都说不出一口流利的英语。

Square: The star should be in chrge .Because many people like the star.Because his well --- known degree can go to buy the goods ,if himself don't know oneself's commodity of acting for others words and not ! The advertising laws and regulations in the U.S.A. fixes:''the star must be to produce Resist against the side: They have no responsibility of law.The product went out the problem .should be from responsibility to produce manager .Have nothing to do with the star.The star has not ability to distinguish the product,atall goods "Sanlu Milk Powder" .Since have the state quality and test the qualified report.Is that state room exemptand check the product again.Such a product He is when star decide if to act for others the words.I think: We when selecting product should rational consamption.Should not act for others the words without clear understanding because of some stars buy.

Zhengfang: Star should be responsible, because a lot of people loved star, because his popularity will go to buy merchandise purchase, if they do not know their own endorsement of the merchandise and irresponsible to recommend the vast number of consumers are very irresponsible act! Advertisement Law of the United States states: "The star must be the real users of products, or there is false advertisement Anti-side: they do not have the legal responsibility of a Product problem, should be the production and sale of the operator's responsibility, nothing to do with the star. Stars simply do not have the ability to distinguish good and bad products, Sanlu milk powder, "both of the National Quality Inspection report qualified, and are exempt National Product, such Product, star in deciding whether to speak when there will be doubts how? I feel that our product selection at reasonable consumption should and should not be a star endorsement because blindly buy, at the same time the Government should take the step up supervision of the quality of the enterprises have a very good monitor, and Star Products should also be used in order to recommend consumers should not be irresponsible to advocate false advertisement